Teams

CC of the South - Barnwell (Jill Coco)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.5 Women (Michelle Wilkinson)

20 players · average NTRP 4.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-01-11vs Life Time (Erin Mowrer)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesTracy Hobbs / Jenifer Childress vs Beth Boddy / Linda Hancock6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJody Turner vs Helen Li7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelsey Arnall / Sue Leffler vs Michelle Wang Neeley / Shandin Manning6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJill Coco / Vanessa Woeste vs Leah Scott / Lily Masoumy5-7, 0-6
W#4 DoublesMadison Claytor / Megan Ross vs Cindy Jones / Holly Blake6-7, 6-4, 6-2
2024-12-07vs Vickery (Jessica Pickron)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesJenifer Childress / Sue Leffler vs Stephanie Taylor / Erika McGowan6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJamie Lunceford vs Jessica Trentacosta6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKelsey Arnall / Jody Turner vs Heather Robinson / Sally Woodhead6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJill Coco / Jenifer Childress vs Stephanie Blais / Rebecca Smith6-2, 4-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJody Turner vs Vanessa Mattesich6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKathy Solomon / Guicela Leal vs Heather Paton / Rhonda Thornton6-3, 6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRyane Davis / Megan Ross vs Michelle Burke / Rachel King7-6, 4-6, 7-6
W#4 DoublesMelanie Sanders / Jennifer Deaton vs Cathy Ganter / Bernadette Graham6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women (Michelle Wilkinson) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Jody Turner
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.47
Tracy Hobbs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.47
Sue Leffler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.45
Jenifer Childress
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.40
Heather Borreca
published
4.35
Dena Risher
published 4.5
4.32
Jill Coco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.30
Marcy Hirshberg
published
4.26
Kelsey Arnall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
Jamie Lunceford
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.19
Kathy Solomon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.19
Ryane Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Guicela Leal
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.12
Madison Claytor
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Melanie Sanders
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Debra Gotting
published 4.5
3.88
Amy Foye
published 4
3.83
Megan Ross
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Jennifer Deaton
published
Vanessa Woeste
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Hobbs + Jill Coco11172% games+13.7% vs expected
Kathy Solomon + Marcy Hirshberg6358% games+9.6% vs expected
Kathy Solomon + Jill Coco16461% games+7.2% vs expected
Tracy Hobbs + Sue Leffler14171% games+6.2% vs expected
Sue Leffler + Ryane Davis12164% games+3.6% vs expected
Megan Ross + Amy Foye4451% games+2.5% vs expected
Tracy Hobbs + Jenifer Childress11561% games+0.9% vs expected
Jenifer Childress + Jill Coco8256% games−6.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jody Turner
52W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
4.50
Tracy Hobbs
69W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
4.47
Sue Leffler
62W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
4.47
Jenifer Childress
53W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.45
Heather Borreca
27W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Dena Risher
20W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
4.35
Jill Coco
66W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
4.32
Marcy Hirshberg
60W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
Kelsey Arnall
11W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.26
Jamie Lunceford
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
Kathy Solomon
42W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
4.19
Ryane Davis
42W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
Guicela Leal
17W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
4.14
Madison Claytor
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%20%80%
4.12
Melanie Sanders
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
43%57%<1%
4.03
4.5
Debra Gotting
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.92
4
Amy Foye
19W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Megan Ross
27W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Jennifer Deaton
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vanessa Woeste
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.