Teams

Life Time (Erin Mowrer)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.5 Women (Michelle Wilkinson)

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesBeth Boddy / Linda Hancock vs Tracy Hobbs / Jenifer Childress3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Wang Neeley / Shandin Manning vs Kelsey Arnall / Sue Leffler1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLeah Scott / Lily Masoumy vs Jill Coco / Vanessa Woeste7-5, 6-0
L#4 DoublesCindy Jones / Holly Blake vs Madison Claytor / Megan Ross7-6, 4-6, 2-6
2024-12-14vs USTA Atlanta/Belsaid AguirreLost 13
L#1 DoublesLinda Hancock / Page Love vs Kate Grosch / Marielba Zambrano4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Wang Neeley vs Katie Baker0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLily Masoumy / Leah Scott vs Jennifer Beebe / Martha Fair2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCindy Jones / Beth Boddy vs Kathy Watts / Jennifer Bracale7-6, 6-2
2024-12-07vs Kimball Farms (Heather Cotton)*Won 31
W#1 DoublesLinda Hancock / Leah Scott vs Katie ORielly / Sandi McEnery3-6, 7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMichelle Wang Neeley vs Judy Armour4-6, 6-1, 3-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Jones / Sarika Gowda vs Debbie Tanner / Kathy Biondich6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesShandin Manning / Rachel Turner vs Jamie Harlin / Mercedes Figueroa7-5, 3-6, 0-6
2024-11-23vs Vickery (Jessica Pickron)*Lost 13
L#1 DoublesLinda Hancock / Page Love vs Ashley Segrave / Jessica Trentacosta1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesLily Masoumy vs Heather Robinson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLeah Scott / Katherine Kardian vs Sandi Staiti / Cathy Niemi5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesErin Mowrer / Katie Thomas vs Sara Crosby / Sandra Alcala3-6, 6-4, 6-2
2024-11-16vs Atlanta AC (Christi Luskin)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesLinda Hancock / Page Love vs Kelly Boling / Lindsey Sprinkle Shaver4-6, 7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMichelle Wang Neeley vs Ingrid Duva6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLily Masoumy / Sarika Gowda vs Amanda Barfield / Gretchen Levy6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Jones / Shandin Manning vs Christi Luskin / Lyndsay Head1-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesHolly Blake / Katherine Kardian vs Denise Fisher / Debi Doverspike6-2, 6-0
2024-11-09vs Chattahoochee RC (Mia Malafronte)*Lost 23
W#1 DoublesLily Masoumy / Leah Scott vs Jeanne Buckman / Heather Paton6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesMichelle Wang Neeley vs Vanessa Mattesich6-2, 1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesErin Mowrer / Katie Thomas vs Stephanie Blais / Rebecca Smith4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPage Love / Katherine Kardian vs Kim Schmal / Rhonda Thornton3-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesHelen Li / Cindy Jones vs Michelle Burke / Allison Futch6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women (Michelle Wilkinson) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Leah Scott
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.19
Holly Blake
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Erin Mowrer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.14
Beth Boddy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Michelle Wang Neeley
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #4 Doubles 13% · published
4.09
Cindy Jones
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.99
Katherine Kardian
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.93
Shandin Manning
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.86
Lily Masoumy
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.85
Sarika Gowda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.83
Rachel Turner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Helen Li
published
Linda Hancock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Page Love
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Boddy + Shandin Manning3448% games+8.6% vs expected
Cindy Jones + Michelle Wang Neeley5166% games+1.6% vs expected
Leah Scott + Lily Masoumy2342% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Jones + Shandin Manning224 matchesnot enough data
Linda Hancock + Page Love123 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Jones + Leah Scott303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leah Scott
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Holly Blake
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
Erin Mowrer
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Beth Boddy
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.14
Michelle Wang Neeley
63W–16L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
4.11
4
Cindy Jones
60W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
4.09
Katherine Kardian
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.99
Shandin Manning
17W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
Lily Masoumy
6W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.86
Sarika Gowda
13W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Rachel Turner
16W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Helen Li
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Hancock
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Page Love
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.