Teams

DTC GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-30vs WP SILVERLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaura Spangler / Jane Doe vs Lynn Pearson / Megan Gunden7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-05-23vs GPTC YELLOWWon 10
W#1 DoublesJenna Bambei / Wendy Glazer vs Susan Rosenthal / Esther Song6-3, 6-0
2024-05-17vs GTC PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Kelly / Maura Spangler vs Lisa Winston / Meredith Munro6-3, 6-3
2024-05-16vs CP REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesWendy Glazer / Jenna Bambei vs Christine Regis / Ashley Banister-Riley1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaura Spangler / Margaret Fell vs Katie Kennedy / Annie Rapson6-7, 5-7
2024-05-09vs CACM PINKWon 10
W#1 DoublesWendy Glazer / Jenna Bambei vs Kris Staaf-Bendixen / Barbara Hall7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2024-05-02vs APR-U NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaura Spangler / Sharon Kelly vs Kathleen McKern / Cathy Shahan6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJenna Bambei vs Stacey Gilmore6-3, 7-6
2024-04-25vs CACM GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSharon Kelly / Maura Spangler vs Kelly Fitz / BethAnn Parsons6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJenna Bambei / Wendy Glazer vs Sara Vanek / Rachel Nutt4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Maura Spangler
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.36
Sharon Kelly
published
3.30
Jenna Bambei
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Wendy Glazer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Elizabeth Belson
published
2.81
Teri Smith
published
Christian Hawley
published 3
2.43
Evelyn Shafer
published
Valeria Alberola
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Glazer + Jenna Bambei8652% games−5.8% vs expected
Maura Spangler + Sharon Kelly303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Maura Spangler
49W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.42
Sharon Kelly
19W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Jenna Bambei
20W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Wendy Glazer
79W–93L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Elizabeth Belson
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Teri Smith
16W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Christian Hawley
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Evelyn Shafer
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.43
Valeria Alberola
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.