Teams

APR-U NAVY

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-30vs CACM GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesLynn LaTorre / Kathleen McKern vs Emily Pruisner / Monique Wehrle1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesStacey Gilmore vs Sarah Bailey2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Shahan / Barbara Vander Wall vs Rachel Nutt / Sara Vanek2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCarolyn Jeffrey vs Kelly Fitz3-6, 3-6
2024-05-28vs CP REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesMuffy Steinhoff / Carolyn Jeffrey vs Ashley Banister-Riley / Annie Rapson6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesStacey Gilmore vs Carrie Lee3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCathy Shahan vs Carolyn Welter6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLynn LaTorre / Barbara Vander Wall vs Stephanie Sims / Lindsey Bieging2-6, 3-6
2024-05-23vs WP SILVERLost 04
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Jeffrey / Lynn LaTorre vs Rachel Williams / Lynn Pearson2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStacey Gilmore vs Michela Zafferani1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusan High / Barbara Vander Wall vs Tiffany Cruikshank / Audrey Hamilton1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMuffy Steinhoff / Kathleen McKern vs Megan Gunden / Ann Shiveley1-6, 2-6
2024-05-16vs GPTC YELLOWWon 41
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Jeffrey / Kathleen McKern vs Susan Rosenthal / Suzanne Lougheed6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCathy Shahan vs Nicoal Sperrazza6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBarbara Vander Wall / Susan High vs Rene Moore / Lindsay Wagner2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesStacey Gilmore vs Morgan Ryan6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMuffy Steinhoff / Lynn LaTorre vs Janet Hajek / Esther Song0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-05-02vs DTC GREENLost 14
L#1 DoublesKathleen McKern / Cathy Shahan vs Maura Spangler / Sharon Kelly2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStacey Gilmore vs Jenna Bambei3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSusan High / Connie Parris vs Jane Doe / Jackie M Kotoch1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLynn LaTorre vs Valeria Alberola3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Jeffrey / Barbara Vander Wall vs Margaret Fell / Evelyn Shafer6-1, 7-6
2024-05-02vs CACM PINKLost 14
L#1 DoublesLynn LaTorre / Kathleen McKern vs Kris Staaf-Bendixen / Barbara Hall2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Jeffrey vs Jennifer Kane6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesConnie Parris / Stacey Gilmore vs Kristin Nelson / Eden Parker2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCathy Shahan vs ELIF SARAC6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMuffy Steinhoff / Susan High vs Brooke Webb / Sarah Jensik1-6, 1-6
2024-04-25vs GTC PURPLELost 23
L#1 DoublesMuffy Steinhoff / Julie Thornton vs Jodi Frangiamore / Meredith Munro2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Jeffrey vs Kelly Nordini6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKathleen McKern / Lynn LaTorre vs Kimi Davis / Rachael Gray Smith2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesStacey Gilmore vs Sarah Gilbert6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBarbara Vander Wall / Susan High vs Megan Ackley / MacAyla Hansen1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Cathy Shahan
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
Carolyn Jeffrey
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.06
Kathleen McKern
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.99
Stacey Gilmore
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.87
Lynn LaTorre
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.74
Barbara Vander Wall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Muffy Steinhoff
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Susan High
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Shahan + Muffy Steinhoff4451% games+6.4% vs expected
Stacey Gilmore + Cathy Shahan2439% games−0.7% vs expected
Lynn LaTorre + Kathleen McKern41939% games−4.4% vs expected
Muffy Steinhoff + Lynn LaTorre0540% games−6.4% vs expected
Muffy Steinhoff + Barbara Vander Wall2641% games−7.4% vs expected
Lynn LaTorre + Carolyn Jeffrey314 matchesnot enough data
Lynn LaTorre + Barbara Vander Wall224 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Jeffrey + Barbara Vander Wall224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cathy Shahan
69W–81L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Carolyn Jeffrey
23W–25L career · 7 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.13
Kathleen McKern
22W–47L career · 6 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.06
Stacey Gilmore
24W–37L career · 7 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.99
Lynn LaTorre
23W–62L career · 7 lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Barbara Vander Wall
12W–19L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Muffy Steinhoff
34W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
2.63
Susan High
13W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.