Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/Bastian

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.5W PM

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-10Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAlison Pearce / Bonnie Whitesides vs Katie Swensen / Alena Taylor6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDelia Bayna / Lindsey Little vs Kim Cronin / Becky Hall1-6, 2-6
2022-08-04vs Brighton High School-CarruthersWon 10
W#3 DoublesShannon Halverson / Kate Franko vs Sharon Larkin / Linda Pack7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2022-08-03vs Cottonwood Club-Annunziata/SimmonsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Chandramouli / Bonnie Whitesides vs Mindi Paskins / Robin Simmons4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke McCloskey / Janine Sholeff vs Michelle Cutler / Lauren Annunziata1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Halverson / Emily Pearson vs Jeanette Shepard / Nicole Fisher0-6, 4-6
2022-07-27vs Liberty Park Tennis-DayLost 03
L#1 DoublesCollette Renstrom / Shannon Halverson vs Lynley Hogan / Lori Wilson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke McCloskey / Janine Sholeff vs Rebecca Harman / Michelle Weddington1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDelia Bayna / Lindsey Little vs Sarah Law / Maria Pettit6-7, 2-6
2022-07-20vs Sports Mall-Henderson/WalljasperLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Pearson / Janine Sholeff vs Jennifer Sampson / Debra Knowlton2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJane Chandramouli / Shannon Halverson vs Janelle Horton / Martha Brown2-6, 1-6
2022-06-29vs Ivory Ridge-Patch/JohnsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesDelia Bayna / Janine Sholeff vs Marilyn Patch / Cecia Croft6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLindsey Little vs Kelly Midgley7-5, 6-3
2022-06-22vs Liberty Park Tennis-ByingtonLost 02
L#1 DoublesLindsey Little / Emily Pearson vs Shanna Sirstins / Linda Byington3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Pearce / Janine Sholeff vs Brenda Whicker / Michelle Barton4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-15vs Liberty Park Tennis-Stacey/CooperLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Pearson / Collette Renstrom vs Lisa Ewing / Kristen Treanor2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5W PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Brighton High School-Carruthers26131941320
2Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/Bastian26102248339

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jaime Vance
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 4
3.34
Bonnie Whitesides
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Emily Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Collette Renstrom
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Janine Sholeff
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Lindsey Little
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Alison Pearce
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 31% · published 3.5
2.85
Shannon Halverson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jane Chandramouli
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
Kate Franko
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.65
Delia Bayna
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.65
KayeLynn BASTIAN
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
Brooke McCloskey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Cindy Ostrowski
published 0
Kara Agresta
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jaime Vance + Bonnie Whitesides5059% games+9.4% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Jaime Vance20364% games+5.3% vs expected
Shannon Halverson + Collette Renstrom4445% games+2.8% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Delia Bayna2738% games+0.3% vs expected
Janine Sholeff + Collette Renstrom2439% games−6.2% vs expected
Lindsey Little + Delia Bayna0529% games−8.1% vs expected
Brooke McCloskey + Lindsey Little0828% games−12.5% vs expected
Brooke McCloskey + Collette Renstrom0524% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jaime Vance
176W–62L career · 16 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
3.5
Bonnie Whitesides
40W–25L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Emily Pearson
3W–15L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Collette Renstrom
60W–76L career · 9 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Janine Sholeff
101W–94L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Lindsey Little
30W–87L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Alison Pearce
171W–202L career · 13 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.06
3
Shannon Halverson
25W–43L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Jane Chandramouli
60W–125L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Kate Franko
50W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Delia Bayna
204W–265L career · 15 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
KayeLynn BASTIAN
209W–244L career · 11 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Brooke McCloskey
12W–70L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
0
Cindy Ostrowski
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kara Agresta
4W–17L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.