Teams

Epworth/Karen Hufnagel

2024 GIT USTA Adult 55 & Over - Winter '24 · Women 3.5 Thursday 10am

18 players · average NTRP 3.42 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-03-14vs GIT/Cricket MadzinskiWon 10
W#3 DoublesCindy Atkison / Cheryl Keefer vs Sara Fennell / Jeanne Swindle6-0, 6-4
2024-02-22vs GIT/Cricket MadzinskiWon 10
W#3 DoublesJanie Doroff / Cindy Atkison vs Helen Crenshaw / Elizabeth Meadows6-1, 6-3
2024-02-15vs GIT/Cricket MadzinskiWon 10
W#2 DoublesCheryl Helton / Cindy Atkison vs Elizabeth Meadows / Marcia Beauchamp6-0, 6-4
2024-02-01vs GIT/Cricket MadzinskiWon 10
W#2 DoublesJackie Walsh / Cindy Atkison vs Elizabeth Meadows / Debra Miller6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 Thursday 10am have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Buffy Williams
published 3.5
3.23
Cheryl Helton
published 3.5
3.07
Beth Ann Mascatello
published 3.5
3.07
Cindy Paxton
published 3.5
2.90
Cindy Atkison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.82
Kat Savage
published
2.80
Janie Doroff
published
2.71
Trish Rugaber
published
2.64
Lauren Haines
published
2.62
Cheryl Keefer
published 3
2.60
Liz Smith
published
2.53
Sandra Eastwick
published
2.49
Kim Ballesteros
published
2.35
Karen Hufnagel
published
2.33
Rene Boven
published
2.29
Julie Heller
published
Jackie Walsh
published
Peaches Thorp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Smith + Kim Ballesteros123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Buffy Williams
1W–1L career · type T · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cheryl Helton
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Beth Ann Mascatello
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Cindy Paxton
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.07
3.5
Cindy Atkison
35W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.90
Kat Savage
21W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Janie Doroff
16W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%2%98%
2.80
Trish Rugaber
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
2.71
Lauren Haines
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%16%84%
2.64
3
Cheryl Keefer
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.62
Liz Smith
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
0%23%77%
2.60
Sandra Eastwick
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
Kim Ballesteros
20W–13L career · no lines in 2024
0%54%46%
2.49
Karen Hufnagel
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
2.35
Rene Boven
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
2.33
Julie Heller
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.29
Jackie Walsh
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peaches Thorp
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.