Teams

CIN CX 7.5 IRCD Jackson

Fall USTA CIN Indy Combo Mixed · CIN Indy Adult Combo Mixed 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-02vs CIN CX 7.5 IRCD CurtissLost 01
L#1 DoublesNathan Peterson / Anna Geisinger vs Declan Mast / Sheri Faulkenberg4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-07vs CIN CX 7.5 IRCD AckermanLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Jackson / Renee Jackson vs Nick Bantz / Mallory Inselberg0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKatie Filler / Mike Hiemenz vs Jessica Wilkerson / Luis Santana2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJason Fordham / Anna Geisinger vs Jacob Lewis / Mariko Tsuyuki6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-24vs CIN CX 7.5 MRC VanatorLost 03
L#1 DoublesRaja Ramaswamy / Rani Ramaswamy vs Christian Haley / Carole Clohessy2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMike Hiemenz / Christina Allio vs Amy Vanator / Michael Clohessy6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJames Jackson / Renee Jackson vs Makenzie Isaacs / Anson Isaacs5-7, 2-6
2025-10-10vs CIN CX 7.5 IRCD CookLost 12
L#1 DoublesHewook Lee / Ronald Ruff vs Masumi Makio / John Covert1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Kenny / Anna Geisinger vs Theresa Verde / Rafael Verde6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAaron McClure / Katie Filler vs Sun Park / John Correa6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-26vs CIN CX 7.5 IRCD SomersLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeff Rothbard / Laurie Rothbard vs Catherine McCann / Will Phillips6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHewook Lee / Ronald Ruff vs Chong Cha / Jacqueline Bartelt3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · CIN Indy Adult Combo Mixed 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CIN CX 7.5 IRCD Ackerman7017411141
2CIN CX 7.5 IRCD Curtiss6114716155
3CIN CX 7.5 IRCD Holly5315922191
4CIN CX 7.5 MRC Vanator3413819168
5CIN CX 7.5 CSWC Hackney3581636257
6CIN CX 7.5 IRCD Cook2571432221
7CIN CX 7.5 IHP Airgood1742042270
8CIN CX 7.5 IRCD Jackson030918108
9CIN CX 7.5 IRCD Somers0731837247

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Jason Fordham
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.56
Christina Allio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Michael Kenny
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Katie Filler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Aaron McClure
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Anna Geisinger
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Hewook Lee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Laurie Rothbard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Ronald Ruff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Mike Hiemenz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Rothbard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nathan Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Raja Ramaswamy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rani Ramaswamy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Renee Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Rothbard + Jeff Rothbard11756% games+1.1% vs expected
Katie Filler + Aaron McClure21856% games−3.8% vs expected
Hewook Lee + Ronald Ruff124537% games−13.5% vs expected
Jason Fordham + Renee Jackson241457% gamesnot enough data
Anna Geisinger + Nathan Peterson2546% gamesnot enough data
Michael Kenny + Christina Allio5163% gamesnot enough data
Anna Geisinger + Aaron McClure3248% gamesnot enough data
Aaron McClure + Christina Allio224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Fordham
92W–94L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Christina Allio
87W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
32%67%<1%
3.56
Michael Kenny
144W–87L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Katie Filler
173W–91L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Aaron McClure
162W–114L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.38
3.5
Anna Geisinger
17W–20L career · type M · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Hewook Lee
91W–94L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Laurie Rothbard
167W–110L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
Ronald Ruff
107W–156L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.13
Mike Hiemenz
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Jeff Rothbard
97W–111L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nathan Peterson
8W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Raja Ramaswamy
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rani Ramaswamy
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Renee Jackson
97W–65L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.