Teams

LEBTC GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-11vs BCST PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Auth / Kim Kronenberger Hogan vs Sharon Ehler / Beth Leon6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Renard / Suzanne Termaat vs Judith Wallach / Melissa Zantop6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJanice Nelson / Mary LeSueur vs Mary Mucilli / Kathleen Antony6-2, 6-3
2026-06-04vs HRCA-N YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Renard / Suzanne Termaat vs Carol Avery / Becky Glenn3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Nelson / Mary LeSueur vs Kathy Breth / Becki Jernigan2-6, 3-6
2026-05-28vs KC-CC NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChris Patterson / Suzanne Termaat vs Ellen Lee / Laurie Ross6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesStephanie Auth / Janice Nelson vs Julie Madison / Christie Mann2-6, 0-6
2026-05-21vs BM REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChris Patterson / Suzanne Termaat vs Miki Lorentz / Nathalia Faribault6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Auth / Kim Kronenberger Hogan vs Jane Miley / Ann Gallagher6-3, 6-3
2026-05-19vs KC-CC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Renard / Chris Patterson vs Susan Bratschun / Elizabeth Crites6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Nelson / Kim Kronenberger Hogan vs Lori Goulding / Janie Ramseier2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary LeSueur / Suzanne Termaat vs Maria Fischer / Jennifer Manta4-6, 1-6
2026-05-14vs PH REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Renard / Chris Patterson vs Nancy Waas / Debbie Dispense6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKim Kronenberger Hogan / Suzanne Termaat vs Vanessa Hebert / Stacie Cowell6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMary LeSueur / Janice Nelson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-03vs CK BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Kronenberger Hogan / Mary LeSueur vs Karen Bebber / Kathryn Dann2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Nelson / Jennifer Renard vs Kellie Bonthron / Susan Whatley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChris Patterson / Suzanne Termaat vs Sandy Reed / Lynne Jansons6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Chris Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.56
Jennifer Renard
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.48
Kim Kronenberger Hogan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.42
Mary LeSueur
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.41
Suzanne Termaat
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.34
Stephanie Auth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Melinda Grandy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Renard + Chris Patterson8458% games+1.9% vs expected
Stephanie Auth + Kim Kronenberger Hogan4452% games−4.1% vs expected
Kim Kronenberger Hogan + Suzanne Termaat3261% gamesnot enough data
Mary LeSueur + Kim Kronenberger Hogan044 matchesnot enough data
Chris Patterson + Suzanne Termaat213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chris Patterson
63W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Jennifer Renard
130W–132L career · 5 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Kim Kronenberger Hogan
46W–59L career · 5 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
3
Mary LeSueur
46W–68L career · 5 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.42
2.5
Suzanne Termaat
89W–63L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.41
2.5
Stephanie Auth
93W–79L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.34
Melinda Grandy
29W–46L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.