Teams

HRCA-N YELLOW

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-11vs PH REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathy Breth / Maria Hush vs Nancy Waas / Virginia Williams6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCinda Nab / Robyn Jensen vs Stacie Cowell / Joyce Anderson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAdrienne Cramer / Carol Manlove vs Debbie Dispense / Tracey Allan6-0, 6-2
2026-06-04vs LEBTC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Avery / Becky Glenn vs Jennifer Renard / Suzanne Termaat6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathy Breth / Becki Jernigan vs Janice Nelson / Mary LeSueur6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarol Manlove / Vicki Sullivan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-28vs KC-CC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Caflisch / Maria Hush vs Deven Farris / Janie Ramseier6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarol Avery / Becky Glenn vs Susan Bratschun / Elizabeth Crites5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Breth / Nancy Hong vs Maria Fischer / Kelly Mair6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-21vs KC-CC NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Caflisch / Maria Hush vs Annamaria Augustine / Laurie Ross6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCarol Manlove / Nancy Sharpe vs Judy Greco / Ellen Lee6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAdrienne Cramer / Nancy Hong vs Christine Jacquet / Lisa Garcia6-1, 6-0
2026-05-14vs CK BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarol Avery / Becky Glenn vs Linda Graham / Kathy Knudsen6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Breth / Becki Jernigan vs Sandy Reed / Karen Bebber6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCinda Nab / Vicki Sullivan vs Lynne Jansons / Kathryn Dann6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-07vs BM REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Hong / Becki Jernigan vs Mary Hobson / Carol Markley6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Manlove / Nancy Sharpe vs Suzanne Ernster / Kit Fitzgerald2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Avery / Vicki Sullivan vs Janet Lane / Deborah Lawson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-04-30vs BCST PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobyn Jensen / Cinda Nab vs Mary Mucilli / Maryann Barwick6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBecki Jernigan / Nancy Hong vs Michelle Harvey / Judith Wallach6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Caflisch / Nancy Sharpe vs Kathleen Antony / Kathy Owens6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Becky Glenn
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.98
Carol Avery
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.96
Carol Caflisch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Maria Hush
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.90
Cinda Nab
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.89
Kathy Breth
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Nancy Hong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Robyn Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Nancy Sharpe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Vicki Sullivan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Carol Manlove
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Adrienne Cramer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Becki Jernigan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Avery + Becky Glenn9068% games+5.2% vs expected
Becki Jernigan + Kathy Breth5257% games+2.5% vs expected
Carol Caflisch + Maria Hush5157% games−1.5% vs expected
Kathy Breth + Maria Hush3251% games−1.8% vs expected
Carol Manlove + Nancy Sharpe8849% games−5.3% vs expected
Maria Hush + Nancy Sharpe3344% gamesnot enough data
Becki Jernigan + Maria Hush3252% gamesnot enough data
Cinda Nab + Becki Jernigan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Becky Glenn
51W–60L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Carol Avery
20W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Carol Caflisch
77W–35L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Maria Hush
128W–82L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Cinda Nab
52W–74L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Kathy Breth
38W–50L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Nancy Hong
13W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
Robyn Jensen
26W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Nancy Sharpe
39W–70L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Vicki Sullivan
63W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Carol Manlove
49W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Adrienne Cramer
50W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Becki Jernigan
107W–99L career · 8 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.