Teams

Wickertree 1

2025 SUMMER Combo Women · Summer 6.5W Combo

15 players · average NTRP 3.14 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-25vs New Albany Country ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesLianne Simeone / Cynthia Pawlarczyk vs Marilee Hanna / Laura Harrold6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMegha Khelgi / Jennifer Sugerik vs Yan Omen / Alix Hoekzema6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesErin Flynn / Katie Carter vs Reem Ghanem / Danielle Scheschuk1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer 6.5W Combo have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Lianne Simeone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Megha Khelgi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Emma Gerken
published
3.24
Ami Latham
published 3.5
3.09
Aubrey Mojesky
published 3.5
3.06
3.03
Erin Flynn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Tyler Nunemaker
published
2.89
Cynthia Pawlarczyk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Jennifer Sugerik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Dana Sherwood
published 3
2.78
Kate McAlister
published
Alissa Hines
published 3
2.51
Jessica Lemke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aubrey Mojesky + Cynthia Pawlarczyk2641% games+5.5% vs expected
Dana Sherwood + Deidra Kellogg-Okoye1537% games+3.0% vs expected
Jennifer Sugerik + Deidra Kellogg-Okoye10353% games−3.0% vs expected
Dana Sherwood + Alissa Hines0631% games−13.8% vs expected
Aubrey Mojesky + Megha Khelgi6060% gamesnot enough data
Dana Sherwood + Cynthia Pawlarczyk1442% gamesnot enough data
Lianne Simeone + Cynthia Pawlarczyk404 matchesnot enough data
Emma Gerken + Kate McAlister224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lianne Simeone
48W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
Megha Khelgi
42W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
Emma Gerken
27W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Ami Latham
188W–172L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Aubrey Mojesky
12W–25L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Bridget Shoemaker
68W–35L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Erin Flynn
57W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Tyler Nunemaker
102W–51L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Cynthia Pawlarczyk
108W–162L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
Jennifer Sugerik
75W–58L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Dana Sherwood
29W–72L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Kate McAlister
19W–92L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Alissa Hines
3W–36L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Deidra Kellogg-Okoye
37W–85L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
Jessica Lemke
21W–42L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.