Teams

Men 7.5

2021 Fall Combo -2 Sundays · 7.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2020-10-11vs AllenWon 21
W#1 DoublesPhu Ngo / Bryan Martin vs Dane Markell / Richard Clendaniel4-2, 4-1
W#2 DoublesPhuripak Sukanthanag / John Carlson vs Allen Clendaniel / Gregory Bidwell4-0, 4-1
L#3 DoublesKrisada Meephothong / Anthony Brooks vs Curtis Nelson / Fred Lief1-4, 4-5
2020-10-11vs Paul RisseWon 30
W#1 DoublesBryan Martin / Phu Ngo vs William Cotton / Zachary Vincent4-1, 4-0
W#2 DoublesPhuripak Sukanthanag / Krisada Meephothong vs Michael Oyer / ADRIAN CARROLL4-2, 4-0
W#3 DoublesAnthony Brooks / John Carlson vs PAUL RISSE / Matt Bottini1-4, 4-1, 1-0
2020-10-04vs The BetterersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPhuripak Sukanthanag / Krisada Meephothong vs Jay Green / Russ Baker4-1, 0-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Carlson / Anthony Brooks vs John Rush / Eric Smith4-0, 4-1
2020-10-04vs Game on!Won 20
W#1 DoublesKrisada Meephothong / Phuripak Sukanthanag vs Thomas Kivlan / John Suddock2-4, 4-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Carlson / Anthony Brooks vs Jack Sedwick / Jack Sedwick4-1, 4-1
2020-10-04vs WillyWon 20
W#1 DoublesPhuripak Sukanthanag / John Carlson vs Paul Hemry / Ramon Luna4-1, 4-1
W#2 DoublesKrisada Meephothong / Anthony Brooks vs Matthew Hemry / Charleston Yu4-1, 0-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Betterers411051177
2Men 7.5411051378
3Willy321051373
4Game on!23781988
5Paul Risse1431225104

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
John Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Phuripak Sukanthanag
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.08
Bryan Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Anthony Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.61
Krisada Meephothong
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Phu Ngo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Carlson + Phuripak Sukanthanag6080% gamesnot enough data
John Carlson + Anthony Brooks4160% gamesnot enough data
Krisada Meephothong + Phuripak Sukanthanag213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
John Carlson
132W–40L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Phuripak Sukanthanag
99W–15L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.78
3.5
Bryan Martin
37W–22L career · type M · 2 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Anthony Brooks
110W–108L career · 5 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.04
2.5
Krisada Meephothong
35W–25L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%21%79%
2.61
Phu Ngo
47W–0L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.