Teams

PTSA 8.5

2025 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

17 players · average NTRP 4.21 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings6 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Hounds7321923225
2Let's Get Racketed73201023219
3Drop It Like It's Shot73191126239
4Mixed Shots 8.546131739301
5PTSA 8.546121842312
6Strung Out 8.52882246325

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Leiana Almaraz
published 4.5
4.29
Maria Tangarife
published 4.5
4.26
Adam Martin
published 4.5
4.18
Pratap Murali
published 4.5
4.11
Jennifer Wong
published
4.04
Vanessa Almaraz
published 4.5
3.96
Robert Miranda
published 4
3.85
Suzanna Murali
published 4
3.84
Emily Thomas
published
3.84
Beth Calvo
published 4
3.78
Nicole Hancock
published 4
3.75
Bryan Escobedo
published 4
3.65
Cory Mecham
published 4
3.63
Jacob Sessions
published 4
3.46
Megan Whitlock
published
Jesica Mitchell
published
Mike O'Toole
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Tangarife + Adam Martin131251% games+8.6% vs expected
Robert Miranda + Beth Calvo13162% games+8.4% vs expected
Robert Miranda + Maria Tangarife7362% games+5.4% vs expected
Jacob Sessions + Vanessa Almaraz12354% games+1.8% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Jacob Sessions13262% games+1.7% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Robert Miranda17858% games+1.5% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Pratap Murali161750% games−5.4% vs expected
Megan Whitlock + Mike O'Toole01031% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Leiana Almaraz
52W–45L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Maria Tangarife
96W–48L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Adam Martin
100W–66L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Pratap Murali
99W–68L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Jennifer Wong
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
4.11
4.5
Vanessa Almaraz
100W–93L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.04
4
Robert Miranda
239W–111L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Suzanna Murali
296W–164L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
Emily Thomas
27W–49L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.84
4
Beth Calvo
168W–125L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Nicole Hancock
137W–105L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Bryan Escobedo
88W–69L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Cory Mecham
62W–53L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Jacob Sessions
107W–72L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Megan Whitlock
5W–30L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Jesica Mitchell
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike O'Toole
53W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.