Teams

Drop It Like It's Shot

2025 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

18 players · average NTRP 4.35 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesRebecca Newby / Andrew Pernell vs Leiana Almaraz / Bryan Escobedo6-2, 6-0
2025-09-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Pernell / Rachel Kincheloe vs Kristen Jacobs / Alex Wong2-6, 0-6
2025-08-26vs Mixed Shots 8.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Pernell / Tzu-Hui Chen vs Ashlin Carlisle / Austin Wilkes4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-08-21Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBobette Wood / Andrew Pernell vs Robert Miranda / Maria Tangarife6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Hounds7321923225
2Let's Get Racketed73201023219
3Drop It Like It's Shot73191126239
4Mixed Shots 8.546131739301
5PTSA 8.546121842312
6Strung Out 8.52882246325

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Greg Ferney
published 5
4.45
Richard Davey
published 4.5
4.45
Rebecca Newby
published 4.5
4.28
Rachel Kincheloe
published 4.5
4.28
Mark Malmstrom
published 4.5
4.27
Andrew Pernell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.21
Jody Mallane
published 4.5
4.21
Bobette Wood
published 4.5
4.16
Josh Johnson
published 4.5
4.09
Anya Sandusky
published 4
4.09
Maji Daines
published 4.5
4.09
Matt Rezendes
published 4.5
3.91
Ross Hoffman
published 4
3.91
3.86
Mel Jackson
published 4
3.77
Paula Lawson
published 4
3.75
Karl Baughman
published 4
Tzu-Hui Chen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Newby + Matt Rezendes8268% games+8.9% vs expected
Rachel Kincheloe + Karl Baughman61046% games+3.4% vs expected
Jody Mallane + Matt Rezendes5253% gamesnot enough data
Mark Malmstrom + Tzu-Hui Chen6073% gamesnot enough data
Paula Lawson + Matt Rezendes6064% gamesnot enough data
Greg Ferney + Bobette Wood4162% gamesnot enough data
Maji Daines + Karl Baughman4158% gamesnot enough data
Greg Ferney + Paula Lawson404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Greg Ferney
323W–106L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
4.47
4.5
Richard Davey
44W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
4.45
4.5
Rebecca Newby
136W–52L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
4.45
4.5
Rachel Kincheloe
211W–79L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Mark Malmstrom
40W–33L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Andrew Pernell
9W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Jody Mallane
183W–95L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Bobette Wood
280W–115L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Josh Johnson
41W–28L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
4.16
4
Anya Sandusky
211W–108L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
4.09
4.5
Maji Daines
163W–74L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Matt Rezendes
85W–66L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Ross Hoffman
130W–71L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Leslie Koppenhafer
265W–130L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Mel Jackson
97W–42L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Paula Lawson
203W–118L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Karl Baughman
180W–94L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Tzu-Hui Chen
31W–2L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.