Teams

SFV - Porter Valley Doubles Purple Warriors

2024 SoCal Weekday 18+ SFV Fall · SFV 18+ WeekDay - 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-06vs SFV - Triple DoublesLost 01
L#2 DoublesCristina Nava / Maarit Fenwick vs Christine de la Hoz / Deborah Kerr-Orlik1-6, 4-6
2024-11-22vs SFV - Love 2 AceLost 01
L#2 DoublesNicolette Dallas / Wendy Williams vs Leslie Vastano / Tricia Kim3-6, 1-6
2024-10-31vs SFV - String TheoryWon 10
W#2 DoublesCristina Nava / Michelle Yongyuan Wen vs Fran Prange / Hannah Taylor6-3, 6-2
2024-10-10vs SFV - Sets In The CityWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicolette Dallas / Wendy Williams vs Jacque Clendennen / Dianne Wellbaum3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNicolette Dallas / Wendy Williams vs Amelia Stephenson / Samira Sizdahkhani1-6, 1-6
2024-09-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesCristina Nava / Michelle Yongyuan Wen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18+ WeekDay - 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Summer Williamson
published
3.47
Jennifer Bevan
published
3.25
Nicolette Dallas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Alicia Duran
published 3.5
Consuelo Hayden
published 3.5
3.25
Aniko Hill
published 3.5
3.21
Heidi Bensinger
published 3.5
3.09
2.92
Cristina Nava
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.76
Maarit Fenwick
published
2.75
Angie Wu
published 3
Teri Lorenzo
published
Wendy Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Yongyuan Wen + Cristina Nava8261% games+8.0% vs expected
Nicolette Dallas + Wendy Williams3345% games−1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Summer Williamson
49W–27L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
Jennifer Bevan
8W–18L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Nicolette Dallas
59W–76L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Alicia Duran
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Consuelo Hayden
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Aniko Hill
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Heidi Bensinger
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
Michelle Yongyuan Wen
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Cristina Nava
68W–50L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Maarit Fenwick
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Angie Wu
7W–26L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
Teri Lorenzo
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wendy Williams
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.