Teams

55 & Over W7.0 - CTH Rita Garcia

Adult 55 & Over 2022 · Adult 55 & Over W7.0-Flight 1

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-20vs 55 & Over W7.0 - Ilia ColomLost 01
L#3 DoublesMARIA CALES / Magdalis Costa vs Coral Elizalde / Ana Andino Arellano3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-03-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesMARIA CALES / Teresita Morales vs Alba Rivera / Myra Acevedo7-6, 7-6
W#1 DoublesMagdalis Costa / Milagros Martir vs Mayra Seguinot / Lorna Marrero-Rivera4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMagdalis Costa / Teresita Morales vs MaryJo Mendez / Maria Suarez6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesMagdalis Costa / Teresita Morales vs Linda Rosa de Rodriguez / Gabriela Stoiber6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMagdalis Costa / Milagros Martir vs Dulce Cruz / Alicia Figueroa4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMagdalis Costa / Teresita Morales vs Linda Rosa de Rodriguez / Gabriela Stoiber4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over W7.0-Flight 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Sonia Lantigua-Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.36
Milagros Martir
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.20
Wilma Colon
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.13
Teresita Morales
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Elizabeth Ocasio
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.01
Janet Burgos
published
3.00
Magdalis Costa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Aida Baerga
published 3
2.49
Ana Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
MARIA CALES
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Magdalis Costa + Elizabeth Ocasio7257% games+6.2% vs expected
Ana Garcia + Wilma Colon9750% games−1.7% vs expected
Wilma Colon + Janet Burgos8251% games−2.3% vs expected
Magdalis Costa + Teresita Morales151451% games−2.4% vs expected
Magdalis Costa + MARIA CALES4255% gamesnot enough data
Teresita Morales + Elizabeth Ocasio3354% gamesnot enough data
MARIA CALES + Elizabeth Ocasio2345% gamesnot enough data
Milagros Martir + Elizabeth Ocasio3252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sonia Lantigua-Garcia
105W–71L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Milagros Martir
72W–44L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
Wilma Colon
105W–80L career · 15 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Teresita Morales
39W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Elizabeth Ocasio
69W–64L career · 9 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
Janet Burgos
18W–12L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Magdalis Costa
92W–63L career · 6 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.00
3
Aida Baerga
24W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
2.5
Ana Garcia
46W–42L career · type A · 8 lines in 2022
0%53%47%
2.49
MARIA CALES
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.