Teams

OC Fullerton TC - Masako 10am

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesRobin Briggs / Wanda Shimazu vs Kylie Kandell / Sara Weiss4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Leonardi / Erica John vs Kate Berry / Danielle Wheeler6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHelen Ma / Cheryl Gordon vs Michele Harrick / Tina O'Rourke2-6, 1-6
2025-10-24vs OC Great Park - 930Won 10
W#1 DoublesRobin Briggs / Josephine Chow vs Yuting Su / Jennifer Rowe6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSandi Goldstein / Wanda Shimazu vs Sara Scarbo / Danielle Futrell0-6, 3-6
2025-10-17vs OC Mission Viejo CC - KimLost 01
L#1 DoublesJosephine Chow / Taylor Earnest vs Stacy Foust / Kaitlin King1-6, 3-6
2025-10-10vs OC LNRC - AllysonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJosephine Chow / Helen Ma vs Diane Liberty / Michelle Rucker6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-26vs OC LNRC 2 - OlgaLost 01
L#1 DoublesJosephine Chow / Sheri Kumsakul vs Christina Mecklenburg / Jen Innocenti4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Sheri Kumsakul
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.90
Robin Briggs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Taylor Earnest
published
2.78
Karen Tonelli
published
2.73
Erica John
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Susan Leonardi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Cheryl Gordon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Josephine Chow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Helen Ma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Wanda Shimazu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Patti Schlener
published
2.50
Karin Altonaga
published
Masako Sato
published
Sharon Ingle
published
Zulema Banados
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Briggs + Susan Leonardi3549% games+6.6% vs expected
Wanda Shimazu + Robin Briggs1434% games−11.7% vs expected
Cheryl Gordon + Patti Schlener1439% gamesnot enough data
Josephine Chow + Helen Ma044 matchesnot enough data
Josephine Chow + Sheri Kumsakul224 matchesnot enough data
Josephine Chow + Taylor Earnest213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sheri Kumsakul
38W–52L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Robin Briggs
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Taylor Earnest
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Karen Tonelli
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Erica John
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Susan Leonardi
9W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Cheryl Gordon
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Josephine Chow
145W–299L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Helen Ma
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Wanda Shimazu
2W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Patti Schlener
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
Karin Altonaga
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Masako Sato
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Ingle
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zulema Banados
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.