Teams

OC *Flight WINNER Coto De Caza - Tammy

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-16vs OC Mesa Verde CC - Erin 930Won 21
W#1 DoublesTana Ashton / Cathy Field vs Erin Holden / Linda Marcopulos6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Turnage / Gwen Stavros vs Julie Allione / Cindy Galitski6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTammy Beykpour / Madona Shaheen vs Reiko Kurakazu / Sue Wolfe5-7, 2-6
2025-12-12vs OC Lifetime RSC - ChrissyWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara Scarbo / Cathy Field vs Chelsea van Niekerk / Cori Sperbeck6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesFiorella Villar / Tammy Beykpour vs Heather Donovan / Chrissy Nordheim6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKarah Curtis / Tomoe Stevens vs Jaime Blandford / Linda LaRue6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesTana Ashton / Rachel Ashton vs Ellen Aistars / Laura Anderson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCathy Field / Sara Scarbo vs Dana Buckley / Michelle Levene6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTammy Beykpour / Megan Turnage vs Tricia Collins / Kelley McBride6-2, 7-5
2025-10-24vs OC Fullerton TC - Masako 10amWon 30
W#1 DoublesTana Ashton / Rachel Ashton vs Nicole Festini / Nancy Bergman7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCathy Field / Fiorella Villar vs Janell Aven / Kate Reidel6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSara Scarbo / Danielle Futrell vs Sandi Goldstein / Wanda Shimazu6-0, 6-3
2025-10-17vs OC LNRC Racquettes- TeresaWon 30
W#1 DoublesCathy Field / Sara Scarbo vs Jamie Andersen / Lijuan Huang7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTana Ashton / Rachel Ashton vs Ling Xu / Susan Hoffnagle6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMegan Turnage / Tomoe Stevens vs Dina Kagawa / Vannak ONeill6-1, 6-2
2025-10-03vs OC Mission Viejo CC - JannaWon 30
W#1 DoublesCathy Field / Fiorella Villar vs Jodie Hoffman / Laura MacCartie6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMegan Turnage / Rachel Ashton vs Janna Lewis / Jessica Keetch1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDianna Claton / Sara Scarbo vs Holly Cook / Holly Ferber6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Tana Ashton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.44
Sara Scarbo
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Megan Turnage
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Cathy Field
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Gwen Stavros
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Fiorella Villar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Karah Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gina Rindahl
published 3.5
3.21
Shelly Carroll
published
3.21
Madona Shaheen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Dianna Claton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.20
Rachel Ashton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Danielle Futrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Tomoe Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Sarah Cieslik
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Christy Dodson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Lynda Sims
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tammy Beykpour
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy Dodson + Sarah Cieslik2450% games+6.9% vs expected
Rachel Ashton + Tana Ashton314 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Field + Fiorella Villar213 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Field + Sara Scarbo303 matchesnot enough data
Megan Turnage + Rachel Ashton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tana Ashton
24W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
3.5
Sara Scarbo
31W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Megan Turnage
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Cathy Field
16W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Gwen Stavros
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Fiorella Villar
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Karah Curtis
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Gina Rindahl
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelly Carroll
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Madona Shaheen
18W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Dianna Claton
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.21
Rachel Ashton
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Danielle Futrell
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Tomoe Stevens
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
Sarah Cieslik
3W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Christy Dodson
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Lynda Sims
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.02
Tammy Beykpour
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.