Teams

OC Lifetime RSC - Chrissy

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-15vs OC LPC - Dianne - Sat1Won 10
W#1 DoublesChelsea van Niekerk / Natalie Finn vs Stacey Choi / Nicole Festini6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesChelsea van Niekerk / Cori Sperbeck vs Sara Scarbo / Cathy Field2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Donovan / Chrissy Nordheim vs Fiorella Villar / Tammy Beykpour3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJaime Blandford / Linda LaRue vs Karah Curtis / Tomoe Stevens3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-07vs OC LPC - Dianne - Sat1Won 10
W#1 DoublesChelsea van Niekerk / Natalie Finn vs Lalida Anderson / Maureen Dominguez4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-17vs OC Mission Viejo CC - JannaLost 01
L#3 DoublesNatalie Finn / Jaime Blandford vs Kiera McLane / Lynn Halladay6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-10vs OC Great Park - Leslie B - 9Won 30
W#1 DoublesCrosby Burke / Chelsea van Niekerk vs CHRISTY PARENTE / Jodi Farrell6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTania Reed / Chrissy Bird vs Leslie Boehm / Dawn Shapiro6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChrissy Nordheim / Carolyn Soriano vs Lissett MacHado / Nicole Miranda6-2, 6-3
2025-09-26vs OC Palisades - Zinat/DrewLost 01
L#2 DoublesTania Reed / Natalie Finn vs Reiko Kurakazu / Cindy Galitski2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Chelsea van Niekerk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.57
Mariela Farley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.55
Tania Reed
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Crosby Burke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Linda LaRue
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Heather Donovan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Stephanie Colson
published 3.5
3.27
Cori Sperbeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Jaime Blandford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Natalie Finn
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Chrissy Bird
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Carolyn Soriano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
MeganMary Mills
published
3.12
Catherine Godlewski
published 3.5
3.07
Chrissy Nordheim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Elisa Seapy
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Donovan + Crosby Burke6165% games+6.1% vs expected
MeganMary Mills + Chrissy Nordheim3250% gamesnot enough data
Tania Reed + Mariela Farley404 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Soriano + Chrissy Bird123 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Soriano + Cori Sperbeck303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chelsea van Niekerk
36W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.69
3.5
Mariela Farley
40W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Tania Reed
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Crosby Burke
23W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
Linda LaRue
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Heather Donovan
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Stephanie Colson
41W–26L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Cori Sperbeck
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Jaime Blandford
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Natalie Finn
16W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Chrissy Bird
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Carolyn Soriano
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
MeganMary Mills
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.13
3.5
Catherine Godlewski
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Chrissy Nordheim
15W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Elisa Seapy
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.