Teams

OC Great Park - Leslie B - 9

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-24vs OC Mission Viejo CC - JannaWon 21
W#1 DoublesIldiko Lambert / Gina Christiansen vs Janna Lewis / Jessica Keetch6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMelanie Hoopes / CHRISTY PARENTE vs Jodie Hoffman / Lynn Halladay5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNicole Miranda / Suzanne Weinstock vs Cory Holcomb / Diane Tweedy6-0, 6-2
2025-10-10vs OC Lifetime RSC - ChrissyLost 03
L#1 DoublesCHRISTY PARENTE / Jodi Farrell vs Crosby Burke / Chelsea van Niekerk0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Boehm / Dawn Shapiro vs Tania Reed / Chrissy Bird0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLissett MacHado / Nicole Miranda vs Chrissy Nordheim / Carolyn Soriano2-6, 3-6
2025-10-03vs OC Mesa Verde CC - Erin 930Won 20
W#2 DoublesMelanie Hoopes / Asha Radicic vs Reiko Kurakazu / Erin Holden6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNicole Miranda / Lissett MacHado vs Karen Barloon / Julie Allione4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Suzanne Weinstock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Gina Christiansen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Shiva Shokouhi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
CHRISTY PARENTE
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Nikki Bartlette
published
3.26
Asha Radicic
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Leslie Boehm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Ildiko Lambert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Pam Schuler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Dawn Shapiro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Lissett MacHado
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Nicole Miranda
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.94
Sandy Sinden
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Jodi Farrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
LESLIE SWAN
published
Melanie Hoopes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tara Bradley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Miranda + Pam Schuler2439% gamesnot enough data
Nikki Bartlette + Leslie Boehm3252% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Weinstock + Pam Schuler314 matchesnot enough data
Shiva Shokouhi + Nikki Bartlette213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Weinstock
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Gina Christiansen
9W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Shiva Shokouhi
19W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
CHRISTY PARENTE
13W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Nikki Bartlette
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Asha Radicic
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Leslie Boehm
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Ildiko Lambert
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Pam Schuler
93W–60L career · 8 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Dawn Shapiro
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Lissett MacHado
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Nicole Miranda
14W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Sandy Sinden
16W–33L career · 8 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.94
Jodi Farrell
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
LESLIE SWAN
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melanie Hoopes
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tara Bradley
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.