Teams

OC Mesa Verde CC - Erin 930

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesErin Holden / Linda Marcopulos vs Tana Ashton / Cathy Field0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Allione / Cindy Galitski vs Megan Turnage / Gwen Stavros2-6, 2-6
2025-12-12vs OC LLW Irvine HP - Gee - 1pmWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Holden / Julie Leigh vs Caroline Gee / Michelle Levene6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Plascencia / Cindy Galitski vs Kelley McBride / Ellen Aistars3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-07vs OC Fullerton TC - Masako 10amLost 03
L#1 DoublesErin Holden / Alicia Nofts vs Nicole Festini / Stacey Choi5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Leigh / Karla Micalizzi vs Janell Aven / Kate Reidel0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Plascencia / Karen Barloon vs Keiko Jun / Yoneko Buritica3-6, 1-6
2025-10-10vs OC Mission Viejo CC - JannaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRebecca Gottlieb / Cindy Galitski vs Jessica Keetch / Diane Miller2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Allione / Heather Plascencia vs Janna Canzone / Cory Holcomb4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-03vs OC Team Courage LPC - NishaLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Marcopulos / Kim Dexter vs Gina Christiansen / Shiva Shokouhi4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesReiko Kurakazu / Erin Holden vs Melanie Hoopes / Asha Radicic0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Barloon / Julie Allione vs Nicole Miranda / Lissett MacHado6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Reiko Kurakazu
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Alicia Nofts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cindy Galitski
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Sue Wolfe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Erin Holden
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Heather Plascencia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Allione
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Leigh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Barloon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karla Micalizzi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Dexter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Gavin
published
Linda Marcopulos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Gottlieb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reiko Kurakazu + Sue Wolfe13359% games+3.9% vs expected
Heather Plascencia + Karen Barloon044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Reiko Kurakazu
18W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Alicia Nofts
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Cindy Galitski
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sue Wolfe
14W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Erin Holden
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Heather Plascencia
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Allione
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Leigh
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Barloon
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karla Micalizzi
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kim Dexter
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Gavin
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Marcopulos
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Gottlieb
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.