Teams

OC Marguerite MVTC - Caroline 1030

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-12-12vs OC Mesa Verde CC - Erin 930Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCaroline Gee / Michelle Levene vs Erin Holden / Julie Leigh6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Anderson / Leah Dietz vs Reiko Kurakazu / Sue Wolfe6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKelley McBride / Ellen Aistars vs Heather Plascencia / Cindy Galitski6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDana Buckley / Michelle Levene vs Cathy Field / Sara Scarbo2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTricia Collins / Kelley McBride vs Tammy Beykpour / Megan Turnage2-6, 5-7
2025-09-19vs OC Mission Viejo CC - JannaLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Levene / Gillian Levy vs Holly Cook / Lynn Halladay3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Caroline Gee
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.39
Ellen Aistars
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Julia Keene
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Jenny Thurrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Gillian Levy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Michelle Levene
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Leah Dietz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Patty Rydelski
published
3.06
Dana Buckley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.01
Kelley McBride
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Rydelski + Leah Dietz7256% games+5.3% vs expected
Ellen Aistars + Caroline Gee6753% games+5.3% vs expected
Ellen Aistars + Kelley McBride123 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Gee + Julia Keene303 matchesnot enough data
Gillian Levy + Michelle Levene213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caroline Gee
26W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Ellen Aistars
31W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
Julia Keene
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Jenny Thurrell
20W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
Gillian Levy
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Michelle Levene
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Leah Dietz
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.16
Patty Rydelski
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
3.5
Dana Buckley
14W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Kelley McBride
14W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.