Teams

SCTA/Cindy Hicks

2024 SCTA Winter '23 · '24 - Southern Tri-Level 40 & Over

21 players · average NTRP 3.70 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for '24 - Southern Tri-Level 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Karine Galla
published
3.94
Kimmie Wise
published
3.93
Mary Knight
published
3.85
Lura Hammock
published
3.80
3.78
Tammy Porch
published
3.75
Barbara Lee
published 4
3.57
Lauren Terranova
published
3.48
Vanessa Blake
published
3.47
Stacee Mceldoon
published
3.46
Victoria Serapiglia
published
3.37
Michelle Bragassa
published
3.34
Connie Borovsky
published 3.5
3.33
Michelle Hannon
published
Barbara Kelly
published 3.5
3.19
Cindy Hicks
published 3.5
3.15
Kimberly Mulkey
published
3.00
Jennifer Denney
published
2.97
Pamela Saylor
published
Margarette Coleman
published
Mindy Leech
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimmie Wise + Mary Knight7164% games+7.0% vs expected
Kimmie Wise + Barbara Lee11458% games+3.0% vs expected
Vanessa Blake + Michelle Hannon6651% games−0.4% vs expected
Barbara Kelly + Connie Borovsky91048% games−3.7% vs expected
Kimmie Wise + Tammy Porch224 matchesnot enough data
Stacee Mceldoon + Jennifer Denney224 matchesnot enough data
Stacee Mceldoon + Cindy Hicks224 matchesnot enough data
Vanessa Blake + Victoria Serapiglia314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karine Galla
67W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%32%
3.94
Kimmie Wise
46W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%32%
3.94
Mary Knight
54W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
Lura Hammock
38W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Adriana Marshburn
70W–20L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Tammy Porch
33W–14L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Barbara Lee
65W–33L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.75
Lauren Terranova
30W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.57
Vanessa Blake
40W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
Stacee Mceldoon
42W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.47
Victoria Serapiglia
71W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
Michelle Bragassa
19W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Connie Borovsky
27W–42L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.34
Michelle Hannon
50W–32L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Barbara Kelly
25W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cindy Hicks
21W–18L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Kimberly Mulkey
28W–30L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
3.15
Jennifer Denney
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
Pamela Saylor
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.97
Margarette Coleman
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mindy Leech
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.