Teams

Sports Mall-Rollins/Armstrong

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.0W PM

16 players · average NTRP 3.39 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-02vs Salt Lake Tennis-BaynaLost 01
L#3 DoublesStephanie Favila / Lisa Armstrong vs Karla Block / Sara Ahmadpour1-6, 3-6
2021-05-26vs South Jordan-SantiagoLost 01
L#1 SinglesStephanie Favila vs Heather Bratcher0-6, 0-6
2021-05-22vs South Jordan-SantiagoLost 01
L#3 DoublesStephanie Favila / Emilee Bagley vs Katrina Mills / Rebecca Suelzle1-6, 2-6
2021-05-19Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNoreen Roeca / Stephanie Favila vs Kelly Lund / Lindy Parks0-6, 3-6
2021-05-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Favila / Camille Jensen vs Yoko Walljasper / Angela Jensen3-6, 3-6
2021-04-28vs Salt Lake Tennis-BaynaLost 01
L#3 DoublesAngela Montierth / Stephanie Favila vs Sara Ahmadpour / Mari Bickmore7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2021-04-24Lost 01
L#2 SinglesStephanie Favila vs Yoko Walljasper3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesHailey Garcia / Stephanie Favila vs Magdalena Kovacsovics / Stephanie Gelman2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Trisha Cutrer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.83
Tiffany Zarbock
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.71
Erin Bradley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.29
Dena Porter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Polly Creveling
published
Brooke Rollins
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Angela Montierth
published 3
2.68
Kate Franko
published 3
2.63
Penny Gambill
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
Shawna Smart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.35
Lisa Armstrong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Stephanie Favila
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 2.5
Camille Jensen
published
Emilee Bagley
published
Hailey Garcia
published
Noreen Roeca
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Bradley + Trisha Cutrer6165% games+8.6% vs expected
Tiffany Zarbock + Erin Bradley582657% games+2.4% vs expected
Penny Gambill + Lisa Armstrong1639% games−7.6% vs expected
Lisa Armstrong + Brooke Rollins4259% gamesnot enough data
Angela Montierth + Brooke Rollins033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Trisha Cutrer
216W–112L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Tiffany Zarbock
164W–100L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Erin Bradley
145W–97L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
3.5
Dena Porter
51W–63L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
Polly Creveling
17W–15L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Brooke Rollins
56W–101L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Angela Montierth
11W–34L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Kate Franko
50W–65L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Penny Gambill
53W–138L career · 8 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
2.63
Shawna Smart
108W–123L career · 6 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
2.61
Lisa Armstrong
59W–152L career · 1 line in 2021
88%12%<1%
2.35
2.5
Stephanie Favila
47W–119L career · 7 lines in 2021
0%97%3%
2.26
Camille Jensen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Emilee Bagley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Hailey Garcia
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Noreen Roeca
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.