Teams

CM BLACK

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-04vs WP GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoe Covell / Steven Tamez vs Talwin Filholm / Nick Nyffeler6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-28vs SKY GREENLost 01
L#1 SinglesJoe Covell vs Douglas Poirier7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-08-21vs DTC PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesJoe Covell / Gordon Smith vs Chris Curwen / Mick Milnark7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-08-14vs APR-E BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoseph Mullen / Paul Tighe vs Dan Daly / Hunter Clark7-6, 6-4
2023-08-05vs EM REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Tighe / Joseph Mullen vs Mark Leher / Ethan Lew4-6, 5-7
2023-07-24vs CACM GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Tighe / Joseph Mullen vs Phillip Ruschmeyer / Dwight Smith6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Steven Tamez
published
3.00
David Goetz
published 3
2.92
Paul Tighe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Gordon Smith
published
2.88
David Milliken
published 3
2.79
Luke Taylor-Brown
published
2.77
Joe Covell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Chad Olson
published 3
2.71
Joseph Mullen
published
John Dellasalle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Goetz + David Milliken4170% games+14.2% vs expected
Paul Tighe + Joseph Mullen7849% games−0.1% vs expected
David Goetz + Gordon Smith314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steven Tamez
26W–13L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
3
David Goetz
42W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Paul Tighe
60W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%72%27%
2.92
Gordon Smith
29W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
David Milliken
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
Luke Taylor-Brown
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Joe Covell
40W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Chad Olson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joseph Mullen
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
John Dellasalle
6W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.