Teams

EM RED

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-04vs SKY GREENWon 20
W#1 SinglesMark Leher vs Jeff Heidrich6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTom Giesen / JOHN INGRAHAM vs Mark Jewell / Dan Almuti7-5, 6-3
2023-08-28vs DTC PURPLEWon 10
W#2 DoublesTom Giesen / JOHN INGRAHAM vs John Gordon / Marcus McCarty7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2023-08-21vs APR-E BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesAndy Engeman / Tom Giesen vs AJ Pflanzer / Mark Raabe0-6, 1-6
2023-08-14vs SKY REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesTom Giesen / Stephen Rohs vs Chris Murphy / Andrew Sarka3-6, 0-6
2023-08-07vs CACM GREENSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMark Leher vs Paul Chandler6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTyler Lindvall / Andy Engeman vs John Molina / Tom Peters6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-08-05vs CM BLACKWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Leher / Ethan Lew vs Paul Tighe / Joseph Mullen6-4, 7-5
2023-07-24vs WP GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesTyler Lindvall / Mark Leher vs Jeffrey Merman / Ndudi Oparaeche2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Brian Tanner
published 3.5
3.00
Mark Leher
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.98
Ricky Casady
published
2.61
Andy Engeman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
JOHN INGRAHAM
published
2.52
Tyler Lindvall
published
2.35
Tom Giesen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Ethan Lew
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Engeman + Tom Giesen1438% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brian Tanner
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
3
Mark Leher
49W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.00
Ricky Casady
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%43%
2.98
3
Andy Engeman
24W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
JOHN INGRAHAM
13W–28L career · no lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
2.58
Tyler Lindvall
8W–18L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
2.52
2.5
Tom Giesen
28W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%86%14%
2.35
Ethan Lew
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.