Teams

LNguyen

2022 Cap Spring USTA 40 & over · 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-11vs SWingo 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesTakayuki Yamato / Amrit Narula vs Brian Hardwick / Alan McSwain7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMark Combs / John VanDeWater vs Wes Snead / Joe Smith6-3, 6-1
2022-05-04vs WValdespino/ChappellWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmrit Narula / Scott Schwartz vs William Valdespino / Neal White7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMark Combs / John VanDeWater vs Jonathan Chappell / Willi Hayes6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTakayuki Yamato / Scott McElreath vs Gregory Kash / Joe Neylan4-6, 3-6
2022-04-27vs PShuey/Hasentree 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesScott Schwartz / Amrit Narula vs Spence Huffstetler / Jim Kurosad6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesScott McElreath / Linh Nguyen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-20vs IPataki40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesAmrit Narula / Scott Schwartz vs Vagner Finelli / Kevin Sibillia6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Linh Nguyen vs Roger Hatlen / Eric Solomon6-4, 7-5
2022-04-06vs JDiamondSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTakayuki Yamato / Amrit Narula vs Scott Anderson / Scott Riley1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Jeff Plemmons vs Hai Le / Steven Miller4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-30vs BBrooksWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmrit Narula / Takayuki Yamato vs James King / Bill Francis6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeff Plemmons / John VanDeWater vs Chip Payne / Chris Mann6-3, 6-4
2022-03-23vs JSageWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmrit Narula / Scott Schwartz vs Jason Smith / Kevin Wolborsky6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaniel Murphy / John VanDeWater vs Aaron Vedder / Justin Jones6-4, 6-2
2022-03-16vs SWingo 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesScott Schwartz / Amrit Narula vs Eric Verhein / Joe Smith6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Daniel Murphy vs Stan Wingo / Vann Taylor7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Amrit Narula
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Mark Combs
published
3.81
Scott McElreath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
John VanDeWater
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.57
Takayuki Yamato
published
3.47
Jeff Plemmons
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amrit Narula + Scott McElreath4249% gamesnot enough data
John VanDeWater + Amrit Narula213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amrit Narula
148W–65L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.96
Mark Combs
14W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Scott McElreath
118W–75L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.81
4
John VanDeWater
149W–114L career · 7 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.69
Takayuki Yamato
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
Jeff Plemmons
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.