Teams

SFV LLW - Tiger Lily - Lily Wu

2022 Adult 55 & Over - SFV · SFV 55 & Over - Women 9.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-28vs SFV Golden Vamos!Won 20
W#1 DoublesVicky Blanco / Tamara Tayles vs Janet Wallace / Lynn Severn6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaren Hankinson / Diana Decardenas vs Chiaki Ishihara / Eriko Shigenaga6-4, 6-1
2022-08-20vs SFV Golden Vamos!Won 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Park / Diana Decardenas vs Chiaki Ishihara / Eriko Shigenaga6-2, 6-2
2022-08-14vs SFV Golden Vamos!Won 20
W#1 DoublesLily Wu / Tamara Tayles vs Wendy Pillar / Chiaki Ishihara6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLorna Kim / Diane Perryman vs Jean Hirschmann / Daisy Carlson6-2, 6-2
2022-08-06vs SFV Golden Vamos!Won 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Hankinson / Julie Juliani vs Wendy Pillar / Linda Beisswanger6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Soto / Lorna Kim vs Chiaki Ishihara / Daisy Carlson7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2022-07-31vs SFV Golden Vamos!Won 10
W#2 DoublesVicky Blanco / Tamara Tayles vs Renee Whitlock / Daisy Carlson6-0, 6-3
2022-07-24vs SFV Golden Vamos!Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Bauman / Geraldine Brantley vs Renee Whitlock / Daisy Carlson6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2022-07-17vs SFV Golden Vamos!Split 11
W#1 DoublesCheryl Park / Vicky Blanco vs Erika Tidd / Kathryn Fiscalini6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLorna Kim / Jill Bauman vs Janet Klebesadel / Janet Wallace3-6, 5-7
2022-07-16vs SFV Golden Vamos!Won 20
W#2 DoublesDiana Decardenas / Cheryl Park vs Wendy Pillar / Sherryl Chaffin6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Hankinson / Diane Perryman vs Erika Tidd / Kathryn Fiscalini6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 55 & Over - Women 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Karen Hankinson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.35
Tamara Tayles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.34
Jennifer Bonanni
published 4.5
Cheryl Park
published 4.5
4.19
Vicky Blanco
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Diana Decardenas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Kumhui Feindler
published
4.04
Mary Soto
published
3.97
Lily Wu
published
3.96
Trish Halamandaris
published
3.87
Jill Bauman
published
3.86
Diane Perryman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Lorna Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Geraldine Brantley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Julie Juliani
published
Tracy Muesing
published
Victoria Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Hankinson + Diana Decardenas241158% games+3.0% vs expected
Tamara Tayles + Vicky Blanco221354% games−6.5% vs expected
Karen Hankinson + Jennifer Bonanni404 matchesnot enough data
Karen Hankinson + Diane Perryman134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Karen Hankinson
131W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Tamara Tayles
132W–77L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Jennifer Bonanni
37W–20L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
4.34
4.5
Cheryl Park
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Vicky Blanco
131W–100L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Diana Decardenas
104W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
Kumhui Feindler
58W–36L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
Mary Soto
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
4.04
Lily Wu
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.97
Trish Halamandaris
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
3.96
Jill Bauman
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Diane Perryman
91W–104L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Lorna Kim
210W–162L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Geraldine Brantley
63W–104L career · 1 line in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
Julie Juliani
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracy Muesing
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Victoria Wright
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.