Chandlers Landing/Johnson-Miller W3.5S
2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Sunday · W3.5S
14 players · average NTRP 3.20 / TEXAS
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule7 played
i
Flight standings26 teams · W3.5S
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1McKinney/Hedblom W3.5S | 7 | 0 | 22 | 206 |
| 2Garland/Ritz W3.5S | 7 | 1 | 17 | 233 |
| 3Greenhill/Chris-Ericson W3.5S | 7 | 1 | 17 | 237 |
| 4Garland/Lamarque-Nguyen W3.5S | 6 | 1 | 20 | 210 |
| 5Lakes/Alwood-Silver W3.5S | 6 | 2 | 29 | 258 |
| 6Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S | 6 | 2 | 31 | 282 |
| 7Huffhines/Rodriquez W3.5S | 5 | 2 | 22 | 212 |
| 8Huffhines/Slote W3.5S | 5 | 3 | 32 | 288 |
| 9Eldorado/Armstrong-Griffin W3.5S | 5 | 3 | 32 | 271 |
| 10Seay/Park-Calhoun W3.5S | 5 | 3 | 34 | 269 |
| 11Oak Creek/Grubstein-Greenstone W3.5S | 5 | 3 | 36 | 291 |
| 12SpringPark/Bradley W3.5S | 4 | 4 | 36 | 293 |
| 13Stonebridge/Delbridge-Killinger W3.5S | 4 | 4 | 39 | 302 |
| 14High Point/Mallaki W3.5S | 4 | 4 | 39 | 297 |
| 15Greenhill/Votava-Cole W3.5S | 3 | 4 | 30 | 254 |
| 16Gleneagles/Steyn-Cannon W3.5S | 3 | 4 | 39 | 278 |
| 17L B Houston/O'Brien W3.5S | 3 | 5 | 38 | 310 |
| 18Huffhines/Gomez W3.5S | 3 | 5 | 40 | 313 |
| 19Garland/Lin-Sisk W3.5S | 3 | 5 | 41 | 319 |
| 20Bent Tree/Wilder-Sarche W3.5S | 3 | 5 | 45 | 341 |
| 21Chandlers Landing/Johnson-Miller W3.5S | 2 | 5 | 37 | 270 |
| 22High Point/Herling W3.5S | 2 | 5 | 38 | 267 |
| 23Greenhill/Blackburn W3.5S | 2 | 6 | 55 | 334 |
| 24Las Colinas/Bosworth-Allen-Berkowitz W3.5S | 0 | 7 | 46 | 316 |
| 25Brookhaven/Schmeltz W3.5S | 0 | 8 | 47 | 325 |
| 26Garland/Biancardi-Hill W3.5S | 0 | 8 | 49 | 344 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Leila Gibson + Beverly Meacham | 3–4 | 48% games | −0.5% vs expected |
| Melissa Feste + Leona Halama | 3–5 | 43% games | −4.0% vs expected |
| Leila Gibson + Lynda Bennett | 2–4 | 40% games | not enough data |
| Diane Lanzone + Leila Gibson | 0–3 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.