Teams

Court Jesters

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.65 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2021-06-15vs Grip N RipLost 03
L#1 SinglesCurtis Heishman vs Raja Kumar Varma Manthena4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Massie / Michael Davin Hanson vs Krishna Alluri / Rajan Patel7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMatthew Caropino / Darron Peterson vs Patrick Moore / Gopal Dhingra3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Timothy Brown
published 4
3.80
Steven Garcia
published 4
3.66
Jacob Wingerd
published 4
3.46
Jae Yu
published 3.5
3.35
Jim Baker
published 3.5
3.34
Michael Warwick
published 3.5
3.33
Robert Small
published
3.30
Michael Davin Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
David Massie
published 3.5
Darron Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
David Andrews
published 3.5
3.19
Andy Mehl
published 3.5
Curtis Heishman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Matthew Caropino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Mehl + Michael Warwick11853% games−1.0% vs expected
Andy Mehl + Jae Yu3348% games−3.5% vs expected
Darron Peterson + Robert Small41639% games−7.4% vs expected
Michael Warwick + Robert Small5642% games−11.9% vs expected
Michael Warwick + Michael Davin Hanson12755% gamesnot enough data
Darron Peterson + Andy Mehl8848% gamesnot enough data
Jae Yu + Michael Davin Hanson5655% gamesnot enough data
Timothy Brown + David Massie5358% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Timothy Brown
180W–124L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Steven Garcia
182W–119L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Jacob Wingerd
92W–71L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Jae Yu
170W–106L career · no lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Jim Baker
62W–55L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Michael Warwick
109W–121L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.34
Robert Small
76W–82L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
Michael Davin Hanson
73W–49L career · 1 line in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
David Massie
90W–119L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Darron Peterson
26W–58L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
3.5
David Andrews
11W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Andy Mehl
176W–177L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Curtis Heishman
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Matthew Caropino
15W–27L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.