Teams

Rock Springs Park (Jay Mun)*

USTA Atlanta Spring - Mixed 18 & Over · 3.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-24vs Brookfield Chase (Brian Vong)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesInkyu Kang / Hee Hyun Kim vs Ganesh Prabakaran / Emma Tsaur0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJay Mun / Heejee Hwang vs Henry Xu / Manya Kothapalli3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJaeyoung Lee / Hannah Chong vs Khristian Pena / Stephanie Ng4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-17vs WP Jones (Lilian Cropper)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesInkyu Kang / Hee Hyun Kim vs Xinyu Zhao / Aya Turner7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesChanggi Kang / Hannah Chong vs Samir Salihbegovic / Li Wiles6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSuhwan Kim / Heejee Hwang vs Lilian Cropper / Sebastian Suzuki2-6, 0-6
2026-04-03vs TPC Sugarloaf (Dennis Lee)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesChanggi Kang / Hee Hyun Kim vs Moses Chae / Yunji Yim0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJaeyoung Lee / Min Yoo Kim vs Stephen Park / Mi Park1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJay Mun / Hannah Chong vs Sunghyun Park / Hoonee Chung6-4, 6-3
2026-03-27vs Hamilton Mill (Youn Jeoung)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesChanggi Kang / Hee Hyun Kim vs Yeunsoo Lee / Jiwon Kim6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJaeyoung Lee / Hannah Chong vs Brad Tucker / Youn Jeoung6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMin Yoo Kim / Suhwan Kim vs Seongho Lee / Chloe Park3-6, 3-6
2026-03-20vs GAC (Joi Fairell)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesMin Yoo Kim / Changgi Kang vs Alex Ogletree / Larry Butler6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHannah Chong / Inkyu Kang vs Ashley Jordan / Benjamin Delija6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHee Hyun Kim / Jaeyoung Lee vs Dana Copeland / Eric Gilyard6-1, 6-2
2026-03-13vs EE Robinson Park (Jongyeob Shin)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesSuhwan Kim / Min Yoo Kim vs Jongyeob shin / Soyoun Lee7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJaeyoung Lee / Hee Hyun Kim vs In Kim / Euna Cho1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesInkyu Kang / Hannah Chong vs Calvin Kim / EJ Cheon6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · 3.0 Mixed
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Changgi Kang
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Hannah Chong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Hee Hyun Kim
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Heejee Hwang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Inkyu Kang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jay Mun
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Min Yoo Kim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Changgi Kang
3W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Hannah Chong
6W–0L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Hee Hyun Kim
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Heejee Hwang
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Inkyu Kang
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jay Mun
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Min Yoo Kim
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.