Teams

Olde Atlanta (Kyle Moyer)*

USTA Atlanta Spring - Mixed 18 & Over · 3.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-24vs Wild Timber (Keri McCorvey)*Split 11
W#1 DoublesCraig Giles / Charity van Horn vs Adriana Cifuentes / Brian McCorvey4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnja Giles / Eddie McDonald vs Wilhelmine Casimir-Summers / David Wick5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKimberly Moyer / Raj Nadimpalli vs Aisling Craven / Jason Craven1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Nutt / Craig Giles vs Brooke Wear / Michael Wear0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnja Giles / OTTO MUTZBERG II vs Dorothee Mesta / Tyler Chryst2-6, 2-6
2026-04-03vs EE Robinson Park (Seong Han)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCharity van Horn / Raj Nadimpalli vs Jungju Jo / Jenny Yoon6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Nutt / Josh Hanson vs Youngtae Park / Jinji Li2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnja Giles / Craig Giles vs Youngtae Lee / Sujung Chie2-6, 6-7
2026-03-27vs Olde Atlanta (Dan Donnelly)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesAdam van Horn / Kimberly Moyer vs Damian Heap / Laura Hecht1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJosh Hanson / Amber Baldino vs Nicola Wilson / Gordon Kelley6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKyle Moyer / Jennifer Nutt vs Aj Wilson / Katie Bradshaw6-3, 6-2
2026-03-20vs Cambridge (Michael Woody)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesEddie McDonald / Shradha Yadav vs Hala Yassine / Mohamad Yassine6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesOTTO MUTZBERG II / Charity van Horn vs Philip Bell / Veronica Bell7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnja Giles / Kyle Moyer vs Nara Dadalyan / Rick Matarrese6-1, 6-2
2026-03-13vs USTA Atlanta/Jodi FordLost 03
L#1 DoublesRaj Nadimpalli / Kimberly Moyer vs Bradley Carter / Whitney Lacy3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAdam van Horn / Jennifer Nutt vs Chris Davis / Tiffany Davis0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Giles / Amber Baldino vs Ansley Hall / Nicholas Hall6-7, 2-6
2025-03-28vs Cambridge (Michael Woody)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesEddie McDonald / Anja Giles vs Rick Matarrese / Maria Rodriguez6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRaj Nadimpalli / Jamie Dennis vs Scott Reynolds / Melanie Skotarski6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCraig Giles / Amber Baldino vs Michael Woody / Karunashree Cholleti6-0, 6-0
2025-03-07vs Cambridge (Michael Woody)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesCharity van Horn / Adam van Horn vs Tina Matarrese / Scott Reynolds6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEddie McDonald / Kimberly Moyer vs Rick Matarrese / Melanie Skotarski6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnja Giles / OTTO MUTZBERG II vs Karunashree Cholleti / BINAY TIWARI6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · 3.0 Mixed
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Jennifer Nutt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.00
Anja Giles
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.93
Charity van Horn
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Amber Baldino
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Adam van Horn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Eddie McDonald
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Shradha Yadav
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Kimberly Moyer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Craig Giles
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Josh Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Moyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
OTTO MUTZBERG II
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Raj Nadimpalli
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charity van Horn + Adam van Horn5257% gamesnot enough data
Craig Giles + Anja Giles4259% gamesnot enough data
Charity van Horn + OTTO MUTZBERG II4167% gamesnot enough data
Kyle Moyer + Amber Baldino314 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Moyer + Adam van Horn224 matchesnot enough data
Eddie McDonald + Anja Giles123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Nutt
39W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.18
3
Anja Giles
20W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Charity van Horn
33W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Amber Baldino
48W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Adam van Horn
16W–19L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Eddie McDonald
7W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
Shradha Yadav
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Kimberly Moyer
35W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Craig Giles
10W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
2.69
Josh Hanson
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kyle Moyer
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
OTTO MUTZBERG II
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Raj Nadimpalli
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.