Teams

LI Health & Racquet, Marklin

2021 55&Over Men · 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-16vs Eastern/Consiglio/55&Over7.0MWon 30
W#1 DoublesKeith Becker / Tommy Gulbransen vs Horst Steinsdoerfer / Douglas Johnston6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDouglas Kahn / Kaz Hirasaka vs Martin Marmorale / Raymond Lisoski6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJon Caico / Daniel Marklin vs Steven Kaish / Carlos Montero6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-08-10vs Carefree, Lindenman/RothmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaz Hirasaka / Tommy Gulbransen vs Homero Rios / Clifford Schoenberg6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Carson / Stephen Weiss vs Abe Greenberg / Ichak Listinger6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaniel Marklin / Shashikanth Sevanan vs Nathan Rothman / Bruce Lindenman6-3, 6-3
2021-07-26vs Robbie Wagner, Singer/HershmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesKeith Becker / Darryl Berger vs William Lalor / Warren Schwartz6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDaniel Marklin / Anthony Leggio vs Richard Hershman / Fred Barilla2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaz Hirasaka / Jon Caico vs Steven Mantell / Arnold Stillman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-20vs Bethpage SP, Jacobson/KushnerLost 02
L#1 DoublesDouglas Kahn / Kaz Hirasaka vs Richard Hume / Patrick Ruddick4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMing Zhao / Darryl Berger vs Robert Morgillo / Bob Nathan4-6, 4-6
2021-07-15vs Eastern/Consiglio/55&Over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaz Hirasaka / Tommy Gulbransen vs George Brooks / Robert Savitsky2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Becker / Anthony Leggio vs Timothy Consiglio / Richard Makover6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Marklin / William Carson vs John DeMartino / Neil Horner2-6, 0-6
2021-07-07vs Carefree, Lindenman/RothmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaz Hirasaka / Tommy Gulbransen vs Homero Rios / Ichak Listinger6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoe Scioscia / Stephen Weiss vs Nathan Rothman / Stephen Siegel6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMing Zhao / Mike Sloan vs David Leibowitz / Bruce Rabinowitz4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-22vs Robbie Wagner, Singer/HershmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesKeith Becker / Darryl Berger vs Brian Ketover / Richard Kahn6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTommy Gulbransen / Anthony Leggio vs Fred Barilla / Richard Hershman6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJon Caico / Ming Zhao vs Steve Rosenfeld / Steven Mantell6-2, 6-2
2021-06-17vs Bethpage SP, Jacobson/KushnerWon 21
L#1 DoublesDarryl Berger / William Carson vs Richard Kushner / Richard Hume3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJon Caico / Joe Scioscia vs Robert Morgillo / Patrick Ruddick6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaz Hirasaka / Ming Zhao vs Bobby Brown / Charles Jacobson6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Tommy Gulbransen
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.68
Stephen Weiss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.02
Robert Kaiserman
published
Daniel Marklin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Anthony Leggio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Darryl Berger
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Joe Scioscia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jon Caico
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kaz Hirasaka
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Mike Sloan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shashikanth Sevanan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
William Carson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Weiss + Robert Kaiserman7258% gamesnot enough data
Kaz Hirasaka + William Carson134 matchesnot enough data
Robert Kaiserman + Anthony Leggio224 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Marklin + Tommy Gulbransen224 matchesnot enough data
Kaz Hirasaka + Tommy Gulbransen213 matchesnot enough data
William Carson + Darryl Berger213 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Marklin + Joe Scioscia213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tommy Gulbransen
95W–58L career · 11 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Stephen Weiss
76W–47L career · 2 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
Robert Kaiserman
54W–49L career · no lines in 2021
44%55%<1%
3.02
3
Daniel Marklin
11W–16L career · type S · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Anthony Leggio
22W–22L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Darryl Berger
8W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Joe Scioscia
20W–24L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jon Caico
20W–23L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kaz Hirasaka
59W–61L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mike Sloan
4W–32L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Shashikanth Sevanan
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
William Carson
34W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.