Teams

Fernandez (Salvadore Park)

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Fall Day · 3.0 Adult Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.05 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Marilda del Rey
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.00
Veronica Hernandez
published
2.94
Beth DeCamp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Inmaculada Clariana
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Yanik Labrador
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Andrea Knutson
published 3
2.76
Carole Bernstein
published 3
2.73
Vickie Krall
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Rosana Weinstein Aronson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Janet Sanchez
published
2.70
Mina Schultes
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.67
Ana Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Maria Carpizo
published
2.57
Sarah Deben
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.30
Kathy Swank
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Fernandez + Inmaculada Clariana423753% games+13.4% vs expected
Ana Fernandez + Andrea Knutson5749% games−1.2% vs expected
Mina Schultes + Vickie Krall162647% games−9.2% vs expected
Vickie Krall + Beth DeCamp7754% games−10.6% vs expected
Mina Schultes + Yanik Labrador191251% gamesnot enough data
Vickie Krall + Yanik Labrador101253% gamesnot enough data
Rosana Weinstein Aronson + Sarah Deben14361% gamesnot enough data
Marilda del Rey + Yanik Labrador8559% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marilda del Rey
153W–98L career · type A · 7 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Veronica Hernandez
8W–29L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Beth DeCamp
125W–77L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Inmaculada Clariana
87W–81L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Yanik Labrador
159W–173L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Andrea Knutson
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Carole Bernstein
26W–21L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
Vickie Krall
107W–109L career · 7 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Rosana Weinstein Aronson
81W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.70
Janet Sanchez
15W–25L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Mina Schultes
101W–88L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Ana Fernandez
84W–82L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
Maria Carpizo
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
2.63
3
Sarah Deben
37W–23L career · type S · 5 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.57
Kathy Swank
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.