Teams

DTP PINK

2024 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-07vs NJ PURPLEWon 20
W#1 DoublesJD Herman / Jeanne Cahn vs Barbara Everard / Jeanne Sadowski6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Beth Church / Bev Morrow vs Janice Fischer / Ann Stafford2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-31vs SS-H ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Beth Church / JD Herman vs Nancy Hallowell / Marty Smith1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCynthia Smith / Bev Morrow vs Paula Mitchell / Terri Parzybok1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeanne Cahn / Jill Spitz vs Catherine Corbett / Inge Bentz2-6, 0-6
2024-07-24vs LEBTC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJD Herman / Jeanne Cahn vs Janet Jewell / Denise van Essen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia Smith / Bev Morrow vs Teresa Flecky / Susan Conroy6-4, 6-4
2024-07-10vs PCRK GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeanne Cahn / JD Herman vs Ann Habeger / Jody Mumaugh2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Beth Church / Jill Spitz vs Shari Procopio / Cynthia Glasier7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-03vs NJ PURPLEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeanne Cahn / Mary Beth Church vs Janice Fischer / Ann Stafford3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-26vs SS-H ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesCynthia Smith / JD Herman vs Ursula Geiger / Marty Smith2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBev Morrow / Mary Beth Church vs Lee Silver / Catherine Corbett1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Jeanne Cahn
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.59
JD Herman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Mary Beth Church
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.29
Bev Morrow
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Lynn Wylie
published
Patricia Curry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Beth Church + Bev Morrow491160% games+5.6% vs expected
JD Herman + Jeanne Cahn3346% games+2.3% vs expected
Bev Morrow + Jeanne Cahn213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeanne Cahn
55W–84L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
JD Herman
47W–57L career · 5 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Mary Beth Church
154W–102L career · 5 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Bev Morrow
176W–100L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Lynn Wylie
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Curry
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.