Teams

LEBTC GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.71 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-07vs SS-H ORANGEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanet Jewell / Teresa Flecky vs Paula Mitchell / Catherine Corbett2-6, 5-3
2024-07-24vs DTP PINKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanet Jewell / Denise van Essen vs JD Herman / Jeanne Cahn2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTeresa Flecky / Susan Conroy vs Cynthia Smith / Bev Morrow4-6, 4-6
2024-07-17vs PCRK GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesTeresa Flecky / Janet Jewell vs Cynthia Glasier / Shari Procopio6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-12vs PCRK GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesJanet Jewell / Jann Levinsky vs Ann Habeger / Barbara Gentry2-6, 2-6
2024-07-10vs NJ PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesJanet Jewell / Denise van Essen vs Leslie Haines / Janice Fischer2-6, 3-6
2024-07-03vs SS-H ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesTeresa Flecky / Diane Willoughby vs Ursula Geiger / Nancy Hallowell1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Jewell / Cynthia MacE Sullivan vs Paula Mitchell / Terri Parzybok3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ann Louden
published 4
Denise van Essen
published 4
3.71
Teresa Flecky
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Janet Jewell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Diane Willoughby
published 3.5
3.26
Susan Conroy
published
Carol Nappholz
published 3.5
Rita Danna
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Conroy + Diane Willoughby123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ann Louden
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Denise van Essen
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Teresa Flecky
64W–72L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
3.5
Janet Jewell
22W–39L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Diane Willoughby
11W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
Susan Conroy
11W–19L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Carol Nappholz
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cynthia MacE Sullivan
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rita Danna
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.