Teams

LATA18/Morris/LCC

2025 Combo 18 & Over-STA · Adult Women - 6.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Kaitlin Morris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Haleigh Boynton
published
3.67
Morgan Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Danielle Hilton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Kristin Senn
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Chelsey Ruff
published 3.5
3.25
Page Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Megan Fredrickson
published
3.18
Gina Wilkie
published
3.05
Heather Chittam
published
3.02
Traci Suber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Lorri Cold
published
2.96
Valeri Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
April Holt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Chelsea Kellis
published 3
2.66
Brenda Murphy
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Hilton + Chelsey Ruff3357% games+14.1% vs expected
Traci Suber + Valeri Wilson7452% games+5.7% vs expected
Lorri Cold + Kaitlin Morris5648% games−6.8% vs expected
Brenda Murphy + Traci Suber314 matchesnot enough data
Kaitlin Morris + Morgan Gardner404 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Senn + Lorri Cold123 matchesnot enough data
Megan Fredrickson + Valeri Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kaitlin Morris
32W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
Haleigh Boynton
103W–47L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Morgan Gardner
23W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
3.5
Danielle Hilton
52W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Kristin Senn
55W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Chelsey Ruff
29W–22L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Page Edwards
36W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Megan Fredrickson
22W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Gina Wilkie
35W–20L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Heather Chittam
9W–16L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Traci Suber
45W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Lorri Cold
23W–44L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Valeri Wilson
34W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%38%
2.96
3
April Holt
26W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Chelsea Kellis
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Brenda Murphy
41W–47L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.