Teams

GOG LOWERY

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-07-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesJill Hoover / Debra VanDeVeer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-24vs LTFCS WISNERWon 10
W#3 DoublesDebra VanDeVeer / Jill Hoover vs Shelly Schmidt / Carol Lubell6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-06-10vs MEMPK STEWARTWon 10
W#3 DoublesJill Hoover / Debra VanDeVeer vs Krista Enoch / Elizabeth Price6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Kristen Lowery
published
3.47
Tracy Glaser
published 4
3.36
Shannon Leifer
published
Denise Farrar
published 3.5
3.02
Christine Chiacchia
published 3.5
2.78
Debra VanDeVeer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ginny Hood
published 3
2.67
Chris Waybright
published 3
Jane Ridings
published
Jean Wheaton
published
Jill Hoover
published
Karen Pennell
published
Kim Roff
published
Sandy Rousseau
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Lowery + Tracy Glaser3949% games−1.5% vs expected
Ginny Hood + Jean Wheaton3248% gamesnot enough data
Jane Ridings + Christine Chiacchia224 matchesnot enough data
Chris Waybright + Christine Chiacchia123 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Rousseau + Kim Roff213 matchesnot enough data
Jill Hoover + Karen Pennell123 matchesnot enough data
Jane Ridings + Shannon Leifer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Lowery
38W–52L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Tracy Glaser
48W–61L career · type A · no lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
3.47
Shannon Leifer
39W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Denise Farrar
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Christine Chiacchia
5W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Debra VanDeVeer
49W–68L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Ginny Hood
15W–16L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Chris Waybright
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67
Jane Ridings
8W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jean Wheaton
9W–21L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jill Hoover
3W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Pennell
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kim Roff
5W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rhiannon Villafuerte
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandy Rousseau
8W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.