Teams

LTFCS WISNER

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-22vs MEMPK STEWARTLost 01
L#3 DoublesJane Wisner / Carol Lubell vs Krista Enoch / Lisa Bigelow6-7, 3-6
2021-07-15vs CCW ROBINSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlohalani Kaleo / Carmen Ekblad vs Judith Coughlin / Kathy Rex6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJane Wisner / Linda Acee vs Tracy Slater / Joyce Dickinson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2021-07-08vs CSRC MCCLENDONWon 20
W#1 SinglesCarmen Ekblad vs Alice Ratcliffe6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Cavanaugh / Alohalani Kaleo vs Jenni Ehrlin / Jenny McCabe6-2, 6-2
2021-06-24vs GOG LOWERYLost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Wisner / Linda Edgar vs Tracy Glaser / Chris Waybright1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-06-17vs MEMPK STEWARTWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Cavanaugh / Alohalani Kaleo vs Diane Stewart / Michelle Alvis6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCarmen Ekblad vs CLAUDIA GRAVER6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Edgar / Jane Wisner vs Lisa Bigelow / Elizabeth Price6-2, 6-3
2021-06-10vs CCW ROBINSWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Cavanaugh / Alohalani Kaleo vs Erin Contreras / Mary Robins7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarmen Ekblad / Shelly Schmidt vs Kele Hauke / Meg Jones6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Kelly Cavanaugh
published
3.39
Carmen Ekblad
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Alohalani Kaleo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Sue Arntzen
published
3.11
Jane Wisner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Linda Edgar
published
2.99
Terry Brunner
published
Barbara Hanley
published
Carol Lubell
published
Karen Walton
published
Linda Acee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Cavanaugh + Alohalani Kaleo26961% games+5.5% vs expected
Jane Wisner + Linda Edgar312553% games−1.0% vs expected
Alohalani Kaleo + Carmen Ekblad8357% games−11.2% vs expected
Jane Wisner + Carmen Ekblad224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Cavanaugh
78W–38L career · no lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Carmen Ekblad
81W–73L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Alohalani Kaleo
129W–63L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.33
Sue Arntzen
17W–23L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Jane Wisner
89W–64L career · 4 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.11
Linda Edgar
36W–29L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
Terry Brunner
7W–17L career · no lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
2.99
Barbara Hanley
8W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Carol Lubell
4W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Walton
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Linda Acee
5W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.