Teams

Naples Lakes / K. Hoffman

2025 Collier Mixed 55 & Over Winter · Mixed 55 & Over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-15vs Cambier / SmileyWon 20
W#1 DoublesCurt Hoffman / Karen Hoffman vs Phillip McKee / Rosalee Naples6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJim Kersten / Lisa Paragano vs Hartmut Thiele / Candace Gregory6-3, 6-1
2025-02-08vs Players Club / DuignanLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Hoffman / Curt Hoffman vs Sue Wolf / Kevin Claes4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVicki Prendergast / Matthew Schlegel vs Julie Pearson / Thomas Pearson6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCindy Jannetty / Dominick Paragano vs Patricia Freeman / Dale Teetor0-6, 3-6
2025-02-01vs Vineyards /Won 10
W#1 DoublesEdgar Tafur / Corey Stranger vs Pamela Conger / William Danford6-4, 6-1
2025-01-18vs World Tennis Club / DrazLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Schlegel / Vicki Prendergast vs Eugene Demidenko / Valentina Demidenko4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEdgar Tafur / Gail Priest vs Lee Nagel / Diane Donnelly0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Bosscher / Cindy Jannetty vs Ken Brown / Nancy Brown1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 55 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Debbie Horowitz
published 3.5
3.17
Corey Stranger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Curt Hoffman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Cindy Jannetty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dominick Paragano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Edgar Tafur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Gail Priest
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
James Bosscher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jim Kersten
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Paragano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Schlegel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Vicki Prendergast
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debbie Horowitz
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Corey Stranger
223W–172L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Curt Hoffman
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cindy Jannetty
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Dominick Paragano
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Edgar Tafur
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Gail Priest
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
James Bosscher
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jim Kersten
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Paragano
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Schlegel
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vicki Prendergast
13W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.