Teams

Players Club / Duignan

2025 Collier Mixed 55 & Over Winter · Mixed 55 & Over 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-22vs Cambier / SmileyWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Claes / Kevin Claes vs Jill Chamberlain / Hartmut Thiele6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLes Dakens / Julie Pearson vs Jack Myers / Candace Gregory6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPatricia Freeman / Dale Teetor vs Rosalee Naples / Rich Naples6-4, 6-2
2025-02-08vs Naples Lakes / K. HoffmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesSue Wolf / Kevin Claes vs Karen Hoffman / Curt Hoffman6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Pearson / Thomas Pearson vs Vicki Prendergast / Matthew Schlegel0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Freeman / Dale Teetor vs Cindy Jannetty / Dominick Paragano6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 55 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Doris Duignan
published 3.5
3.20
Heather Claes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Gabriele Woodruff
published 3.5
3.08
Greg Morgan
published 3.5
3.03
Les Dakens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Robin Harper
published
2.89
John Weatherwax
published
2.80
Anthony Ash
published 3
2.73
Dale Teetor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Julie Pearson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Claes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Freeman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sue Wolf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Ash
published
Thomas Pearson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anthony Ash + Susan Ash92144% games−4.4% vs expected
Kevin Claes + Heather Claes4546% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Doris Duignan
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Heather Claes
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Gabriele Woodruff
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Greg Morgan
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
Les Dakens
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Robin Harper
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.02
John Weatherwax
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.89
3
Anthony Ash
14W–37L career · type M · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Dale Teetor
3W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Julie Pearson
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Claes
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Freeman
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sue Wolf
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Ash
40W–57L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Pearson
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.