Teams

JDeConto-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-01vs LKulp-SVCLost 02
L#1 SinglesJulie DeConto vs Lauren Kulp3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBeth Dingler vs Laura Gallaher2-6, 1-6
2025-06-24vs CGonzales-ENOWon 10
W#3 SinglesAmanda Alexander Klein vs Cecilia Gonzales7-6, 6-0
2025-06-17vs MLong-CCCLost 01
L#1 SinglesJulie DeConto vs Liz Morris4-6, 0-6
2025-06-03vs TPrinstein-HRWon 21
L#1 SinglesBeth Dingler vs Rhiannon Ludington2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesSantae Cooper vs Jesse Shoemaker-Ramsey6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesAmanda Alexander Klein vs Tina Prinstein6-4, 6-0
2025-06-02vs ETurner-ENOWon 20
W#2 SinglesJulie DeConto vs Colleen Cowperthwait6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAmanda Alexander Klein vs Emily Michelman6-0, 6-3
2025-05-21vs JMyers-CHCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesBeth Dingler vs Courtney Chacos6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJulie DeConto vs Leslie Fernandez4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesAmanda Alexander Klein vs Julie Myers6-2, 7-5
2025-05-20vs SBartle-ENOWon 20
W#1 SinglesBeth Dingler vs Marta Robertson6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSantae Cooper vs Christine Kruse6-1, 6-1
2025-05-06vs GLoFrese-ENOLost 02
L#1 SinglesJulie DeConto vs Leslie Jackson3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesSantae Cooper vs Kelly Conklin3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Santae Cooper
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Erica Shirts
published
3.01
Julie DeConto
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.90
Beth Dingler
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.90
Amanda Alexander Klein
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Chelsea Donahue
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Alexander Klein + Julie DeConto12854% games+0.6% vs expected
Julie DeConto + Santae Cooper8455% gamesnot enough data
Beth Dingler + Julie DeConto5261% gamesnot enough data
Amanda Alexander Klein + Santae Cooper404 matchesnot enough data
Beth Dingler + Santae Cooper213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Santae Cooper
104W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
Erica Shirts
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Julie DeConto
145W–78L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Beth Dingler
115W–63L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Amanda Alexander Klein
66W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
3
Chelsea Donahue
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.