Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Swalberg/Harmon

2024 Fall Outdoor League-Weekday · 3.0W

13 players · average NTRP 3.14 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-09vs Sports Mall-WoodWon 10
W#3 DoublesAngelyn Sorenson / Jennifer Madison vs Sarah Gardner / Heather Callister6-2, 6-0
2024-10-04vs Cottonwood Club-Ricker/NielsenWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Madison / Heidi Robinson vs Kerry Davis / Sara Turley6-2, 6-1
2024-10-02vs Sunpro-Belliston/AndersonWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngelyn Sorenson / Jennifer Madison vs Cyndi Madsen / Raquel Moss7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#4 DoublesAnnette Ludlow / Amy Beckstead vs Cynthia Bedford / Marilyn Patch6-4, 6-3
2024-09-25vs Park City MARC-KruegerWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Madison / Angelyn Sorenson vs Kelly Krueger / Chloe DiCesaris1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeidi Robinson / Jennifer Madison vs Suzette Cannon / Kristin Finlayson6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2024-09-04vs Ivory Ridge-Nelson/TaylorWon 10
W#4 DoublesWendy Conrad / Annette Ludlow vs Shauna Peterson / Allyson Smith6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-08-21vs Sports Mall-WoodWon 20
W#3 DoublesLinda Larsen / Jennifer Madison vs Holli Allred / Penny Gambill6-3, 6-1
W#4 DoublesAnnette Ludlow / Amy Beckstead vs Cami Shipp / Cameron Nelson6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 3.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sunpro-Donaldson/Cardall71271332301
2Sunpro-Miller71251534287
3Liberty Park Tennis-Swalberg/Harmon62221846348
4Sports Mall-Peterson/Locke53241638329
5Wasatch Rec Center-Ritchie/Heywood53251539317
6Ivory Ridge-Nelson/Taylor44182252374
7Cottonwood Club-Ricker/Nielsen35182247343
8Liberty Park Tennis-Sweat/Pettit17172352396
9Sports Mall-Wood08132759413

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Mary HENSLEY
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
3.20
Angelyn Sorenson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.08
Jennifer Madison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Jill McEwen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Amy Beckstead
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Wendy Conrad
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.84
Rebecca Harman
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.77
Marti Skjervem
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Annette Ludlow
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
KayeLynn BASTIAN
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.58
Heidi Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Mary Jane Swalberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Linda Larsen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annette Ludlow + Amy Beckstead6066% games+13.9% vs expected
Linda Larsen + Angelyn Sorenson7259% games+9.8% vs expected
Mary HENSLEY + Angelyn Sorenson321757% games+8.6% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Heidi Robinson9458% games+6.9% vs expected
Wendy Conrad + Amy Beckstead10559% games+3.5% vs expected
Jennifer Madison + Wendy Conrad3250% games+3.1% vs expected
Mary HENSLEY + Jennifer Madison4451% games+2.1% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Amy Beckstead3546% games+0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary HENSLEY
60W–63L career · 13 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Angelyn Sorenson
71W–52L career · type A · 7 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Jennifer Madison
63W–54L career · 6 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Jill McEwen
43W–55L career · 6 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Amy Beckstead
37W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Wendy Conrad
97W–94L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
2.89
Rebecca Harman
244W–303L career · 14 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Marti Skjervem
62W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Annette Ludlow
11W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
KayeLynn BASTIAN
209W–244L career · 10 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Heidi Robinson
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.58
Mary Jane Swalberg
76W–205L career · 6 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.48
Linda Larsen
31W–45L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.