Teams

Sports Mall-Wood

2024 Fall Outdoor League-Weekday · 3.0W

18 players · average NTRP 2.95 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-16vs Ivory Ridge-Nelson/TaylorWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather George / Shawna Smart vs Jennifer Wily / Jamie Harris5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHolli Allred / Kami Galbraith vs Megan Bean / Gaylynn Gale2-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesEmma Li / Penny Gambill vs Camille Ross / Jill Broadbent6-2, 7-6
2024-09-25vs Sunpro-Belliston/AndersonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHolly Goulding / Shawna Smart vs Gina Anderson / Suzette Greer6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLindsey Pizza / Kami Galbraith vs LaRicia Belliston / Raquel Moss7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-11vs Cottonwood Club-Ricker/NielsenLost 02
L#1 DoublesHolly Goulding / Kami Galbraith vs Haley H Moreno / Michelle Lynn Maxfield1-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesEmma Li / Heather Callister vs Paula Naatz / Holly Ricker1-6, 4-6
2024-08-28Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Packer / Shawna Smart vs Michelle Taylor / Becky Nelson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKami Galbraith / Heather George vs Ashley Taylor / Jennifer Wily3-6, 1-6
2024-08-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Miller / Shawna Smart vs KayeLynn BASTIAN / Rebecca Harman3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 3.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sunpro-Donaldson/Cardall71271332301
2Sunpro-Miller71251534287
3Liberty Park Tennis-Swalberg/Harmon62221846348
4Sports Mall-Peterson/Locke53241638329
5Wasatch Rec Center-Ritchie/Heywood53251539317
6Ivory Ridge-Nelson/Taylor44182252374
7Cottonwood Club-Ricker/Nielsen35182247343
8Liberty Park Tennis-Sweat/Pettit17172352396
9Sports Mall-Wood08132759413

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Holly Goulding
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Chelsea Wood
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Melanie Olsen
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Cami Shipp
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.67
Heather Callister
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Lindsey Pizza
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Shawna Smart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Penny Gambill
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Jill Raemisch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Hallie Russell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Holli Allred
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.37
Kami Galbraith
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.37
Emma Li
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Cameron Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Heather George
published
Lisa Packer
published
Nancy Miller
published
Sarah Gardner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Olsen + Holly Goulding7069% games+14.9% vs expected
Jill Raemisch + Melanie Olsen5163% games+14.3% vs expected
Shawna Smart + Chelsea Wood3354% games+9.8% vs expected
Holli Allred + Hallie Russell8751% games+3.6% vs expected
Cami Shipp + Holly Goulding6256% games+3.6% vs expected
Cami Shipp + Melanie Olsen4249% games+3.6% vs expected
Lisa Packer + Shawna Smart3258% games+3.3% vs expected
Lindsey Pizza + Cami Shipp4252% games+3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Holly Goulding
48W–27L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Chelsea Wood
63W–112L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Melanie Olsen
61W–64L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Cami Shipp
51W–42L career · 8 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Heather Callister
45W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Lindsey Pizza
38W–53L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
2.65
Shawna Smart
107W–119L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Penny Gambill
52W–138L career · 6 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
2.62
3
Jill Raemisch
47W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Hallie Russell
35W–46L career · 2 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.59
3
Holli Allred
49W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
2.53
Kami Galbraith
36W–60L career · 4 lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
2.37
Emma Li
53W–142L career · 2 lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
2.37
2.5
Cameron Nelson
18W–49L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.32
Heather George
28W–52L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Packer
59W–62L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Miller
38W–105L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Gardner
17W–41L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.