Teams

BCC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs TTA BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesCyndy McClung / Beth Goltz vs Tanya Jones / Grace Helgeson2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDevon Winkles / Cherie Jarvis vs Jessica Marten / Cynthia Davis0-6, 6-7
2024-05-22vs RCC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesDevon Winkles / Cherie Jarvis vs Danielle Witte / Carolyn Braun3-6, 3-6
2024-05-15vs NJ ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesCyndy McClung / Beth Goltz vs Kate Swift / Katy Thompson6-1, 6-2
2024-05-08vs CVTA NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesCyndy McClung / Marissa Fahrbach vs Julia Garza / Jennifer Hotka6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDevon Winkles / Cherie Jarvis vs Rachel Fredrickson / Kim Huss6-4, 6-2
2024-05-01vs BRMST YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDevon Winkles vs Cynthia Stadd Orvis4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCyndy McClung / Beth Goltz vs Marlene Evans / Mariah Pomara7-6, 6-3
2024-04-24vs TTA BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesCyndy McClung / Beth Goltz vs Ann Forte / Angela Spees3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDevon Winkles / Cherie Jarvis vs Cynthia Davis / Naomi Fahrner7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2024-04-17vs RCC BLUESplit 11
W#1 SinglesCyndy McClung vs Elizabeth Odegaard6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDevon Winkles / Cherie Jarvis vs Tessa Clement / Audrey Michel4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Devon Winkles
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.51
Cyndy McClung
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.33
Jessica Sonnenberg
published
2.28
Emma Anselmi
published
2.27
Cherie Jarvis
published 2.5
Marissa Fahrbach
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marissa Fahrbach + Emma Anselmi0729% games−4.2% vs expected
Cyndy McClung + Devon Winkles7748% games−4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Devon Winkles
23W–25L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Cyndy McClung
41W–35L career · 6 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
2.51
Jessica Sonnenberg
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%89%11%
2.33
Emma Anselmi
0W–11L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
2.28
2.5
Cherie Jarvis
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.27
Marissa Fahrbach
0W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.