Teams

BRMST YELLOW

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs RCC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesErin Johnson / Tracey Perry vs Karen Stuckemeyer / Carolyn Braun6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCynthia Stadd Orvis vs Christina Sjolin6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTaylor Evans / Mariah Pomara vs Elizabeth Odegaard / Barbara Cole3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-22vs CVTA NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesTaylor Evans / Mariah Pomara vs Kim Huss / Julia Garza6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMarlene Evans vs Ana Jaffe1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesErin Johnson / Lisa Francisco vs Susan Despotopulos / Kristen Keller6-1, 6-4
2024-05-15vs TTA BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesMarlene Evans / Tracey Perry vs Jessica Marten / Naomi Fahrner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Francisco / Erin Johnson vs Grace Helgeson / Cynthia Davis2-6, 4-6
2024-05-08vs NJ ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Francisco / Cynthia Stadd Orvis vs Jolene Harrelson / Lesley Kuhl6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMarlene Evans / Taylor Evans vs Katy Thompson / Christine Russell6-2, 6-1
2024-05-01vs BCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Francisco / Tracey Perry vs Emma Anselmi / Marissa Fahrbach6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCynthia Stadd Orvis vs Devon Winkles6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMarlene Evans / Mariah Pomara vs Cyndy McClung / Beth Goltz6-7, 3-6
2024-04-24vs RCC BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesCynthia Stadd Orvis / Tracey Perry vs Carolyn Braun / Christina Sjolin6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTaylor Evans vs Anne Cadden2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Francisco / Erin Johnson vs Danielle Witte / Kylie McBride6-7, 6-7
2024-04-17vs CVTA NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesTaylor Evans / Mariah Pomara vs Kim Huss / Ana Jaffe6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCynthia Stadd Orvis vs Kristen Keller7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarlene Evans / Erin Johnson vs Rachel Fredrickson / Susan Despotopulos6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings52 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CM ORANGE7032314221
2SKY YELLOW7027819241
3LTFC ORANGE61251027284
4CVTA GREEN61231229268
5DTP NAVY61221333291
6SS-D TEAL5121926255
7GR NAVY52241130259
8ATC GREEN52231231300
9KC-RH PINK52211432291
10SS-D RED52201533279
11DTP PINK52211434287
12PCC SILVER52201535295
13LEBTC PINK52221336295
14BCC GOLD52201537317
15BRMST YELLOW42171330222
16SS-H GREY42151533264
17BM BLUE43201531261
18HV SILVER43211434300
19SS-D BLUE43191636307
20SS-LT GOLD43181742300
21EM YELLOW43171842329
22GR SILVER43161944310
23LPTC PURPLE33141640289
24CPV RED34181739290
25PRKR RED34171840318
26PRKR NAVY34161942325
27VC YELLOW34161943327
28GAC PURPLE34152044354
29SKY GREY34171845326
30CHCC GOLD34152049361
31KNO RED24161431281
32KC-RH YELLOW24131736289
33MVCC PURPLE24141636276
34CACM BLUE25171839302
35DCHS YELLOW25171842328
36SH GOLD25152045317
37WP-L PINK25142145327
38KC-CC ORANGE25152046345
39PCC GOLD25152047343
40CVTA BLACK25132249341
41RMTC BLACK25122350351
42GPTC RED1582245316
43CVTA NAVY15102045320
44LTC-M ORANGE1542653346
45SS-H BLUE16132246333
46KC-RH GREEN16102551358
47TTA PINK16112452351
48SS-LT TEAL16102552379
49CM TEAL16112453354
50HW TEAL1682757390
51SS-D GREEN0762960395
52SS-LT RED0743163403

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cynthia Stadd Orvis
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.43
Erin Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.33
Taylor Evans
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.21
Mariah Pomara
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.08
Marlene Evans
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.05
Lisa Francisco
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Tracey Perry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Evans + Mariah Pomara15261% games+7.6% vs expected
Marlene Evans + Taylor Evans242053% games−0.9% vs expected
Lisa Francisco + Erin Johnson131848% games−3.7% vs expected
Marlene Evans + Mariah Pomara5747% games−10.4% vs expected
Taylor Evans + Erin Johnson213 matchesnot enough data
Tracey Perry + Cynthia Stadd Orvis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cynthia Stadd Orvis
22W–23L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Erin Johnson
42W–53L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%71%29%
2.43
Taylor Evans
59W–36L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.33
Mariah Pomara
31W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.21
Marlene Evans
39W–52L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Lisa Francisco
39W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Tracey Perry
19W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.