Teams

USTA40S/HollyTree/Close

2025 UPTA Singles 40 & Over - SC · 40+ Singles Men - 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-26vs UPTA40S/Edwards/CardinalLost 12
W#1 SinglesJimmy ten Pas vs David Foster6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesChris Hart vs Keshava Maragondanahalli6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMichael Close vs Dave Federspiel0-6, 2-6
2025-10-12vs UPTA40S/Meredith/ACACLost 03
L#1 SinglesWilliam Fuqua vs Hugo Juarez1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesMichael San Francisco vs Adam Thompson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesDoug Mort vs Brad Meredith3-6, 1-6
2025-10-05vs UPTA40S/Gajewski/Neely FarmLost 12
L#1 SinglesJimmy ten Pas vs Jeff Warren4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesWilliam Fuqua vs Justin Glinisty2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesBrent Graeber vs Matthew Joseph6-1, 6-1
2025-09-28vs UPTA40S/Pack/BrookstoneSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJimmy ten Pas vs Kevin Turner6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMichael San Francisco vs Troy Botts2-6, 1-6
2025-09-21vs UPTA40S/Blanding/GCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesBrent Graeber vs Thomas Cheves3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDoug Mort vs Taylor Gribbin4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesMichael Close vs Adam Landrum1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40+ Singles Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Jimmy ten Pas
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.18
Brent Graeber
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
3.11
Chris Hart
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Doug Mort
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Marc Begin
published
Michael Close
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Michael San Francisco
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
William Fuqua
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Hart + Jimmy ten Pas5266% games+31.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jimmy ten Pas
19W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.26
3
Brent Graeber
21W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
3.5
Chris Hart
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Doug Mort
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marc Begin
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Close
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael San Francisco
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Fuqua
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.