Teams

UPTA40S/Blanding/GCC

2025 UPTA Singles 40 & Over - SC · 40+ Singles Men - 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-19vs UPTA40S/Gajewski/Neely FarmLost 02
L#2 SinglesLEE NORWOOD vs David Allen5-7, 6-7
L#3 SinglesMcFaddin Blanding vs Richard Gajewski2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-10-12vs UPTA40S/Pack/BrookstoneLost 02
L#1 SinglesTaylor Gribbin vs Matthew Fox0-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesMcFaddin Blanding vs Troy Botts6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-05vs UPTA40S/Meredith/ACACWon 21
W#1 SinglesThomas Cheves vs Richard Penland6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTaylor Gribbin vs Russell Shelley7-5, 6-4
L#3 SinglesGregory Ingram vs Josh Burton1-6, 3-6
2025-09-28vs UPTA40S/Edwards/CardinalWon 21
W#1 SinglesTaylor Gribbin vs Keshava Maragondanahalli6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesGregory Ingram vs Jacob White7-6, 6-0
L#3 SinglesMcFaddin Blanding vs Dave Federspiel6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-21vs USTA40S/HollyTree/CloseWon 30
W#1 SinglesThomas Cheves vs Brent Graeber6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTaylor Gribbin vs Doug Mort6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAdam Landrum vs Michael Close6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40+ Singles Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Taylor Gribbin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.38
Adam Landrum
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
LEE NORWOOD
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.24
Thomas Cheves
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.15
McFaddin Blanding
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.09
Eric Hassman
published
Gregory Ingram
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LEE NORWOOD + Adam Landrum224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Gribbin
22W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Adam Landrum
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
LEE NORWOOD
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Thomas Cheves
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
McFaddin Blanding
29W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
Eric Hassman
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.09
Gregory Ingram
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.