Teams

Oakey's

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over · Women 4.0 - 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-27vs Montana/Erickson/40 & Over-4.0WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAnna Bishop / Mary Ellen Stewart vs Elizabeth Lund / Elizabeth Matthews6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesTori Hummel vs Mary Kathryn Tennille3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBrandi Leedham-Erwin / Erin Anderson vs Amy Gallik / Stacie Wunsch6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJan DeCosse / Olivia Gregory vs Michelle Grocke / Danielle Smith1-6, 2-6
2025-07-26vs Mid Court CrisisLost 13
L#1 DoublesLinda Stancil / Anna Bishop vs Sherrie Fuller-Benge / Sue Clark2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTori Hummel vs Chulalux DeMarce6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJan DeCosse / Mary Ellen Stewart vs Susan Ward / Kimimi Ashley2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesErin Anderson / Patti Oakes vs Melanie Matelich / Sarah Miller2-6, 4-6
2025-07-26vs Glacier GritSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLinda Stancil / Olivia Gregory vs Courtney Torgerson / Tracey Gran3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTori Hummel vs Doris Puglisi0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJill Pike / Kathy Nelson vs Jennie Brawn / Anne Oehlerich6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatie Bark / Molly Ogle vs Melissa Haigh / Sara Hemmer4-6, 3-6
2025-07-25vs Montana's Blended FamilyWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrandi Leedham-Erwin / Erin Anderson vs Heidi Fox / Julia Haggerty6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAnna Bishop vs Amber Rassi6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKathy Nelson / Katie Bark vs Mandy Smoker Broaddus / Tara Jensen4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMolly Ogle / Mary Ellen Stewart vs Elizabeth Helton / Gatchina Hessler6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 - 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Anna Bishop
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.76
Erin Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Brandi Leedham-Erwin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
2.88
Patti Oakes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jan DeCosse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jill Pike
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Nelson
published
Katie Bark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Linda Stancil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Ellen Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Molly Ogle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Olivia Gregory
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tori Hummel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Anderson + Anna Bishop5058% games+11.1% vs expected
Patti Oakes + Erin Anderson5552% games+3.4% vs expected
Patti Oakes + Brandi Leedham-Erwin91244% games−1.5% vs expected
Molly Ogle + Olivia Gregory3255% gamesnot enough data
Patti Oakes + Katie Bark134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Bishop
110W–112L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Erin Anderson
106W–65L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Brandi Leedham-Erwin
137W–92L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Patti Oakes
79W–191L career · 1 line in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
Jan DeCosse
28W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Pike
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Nelson
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Bark
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Stancil
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Ellen Stewart
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly Ogle
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Olivia Gregory
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tori Hummel
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.