Teams

Armonk Tennis Club: Aces Wild

2025 40&Over Women · 3.0

21 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-15vs Club Fit Briarcliff: Slice Of LifeSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDeborah Dekker / Laura Feinerman vs Jeanette Kim / Tracy Ji1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRobyn Cameron vs Lei Liang5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlicia Cintron / Felisse Starker vs Karen Aiken / Danielle Shapiro6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCaroline Eickelbeck / Pamela Tuzzo vs Jackie DeVittorio / Maureen Varcasio6-7, 7-5
2025-07-08vs Pleasantville Tennis ClubWon 31
W#1 DoublesDeborah Dekker / Laura Feinerman vs Bernadette Walsh / Elizabeth Ward6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKimberly Paolercio vs Dana O'Brien0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLindsay Brand / Felisse Starker vs Fiona Finnan / Mary Lisa Lampe6-4, 6-6
W#3 DoublesSvetlana Maisheva / Monica Lynn vs Deirdre Dattoma / Adela Kahn6-0, 7-6
2025-07-02vs Club Fit JV - ACESWon 40
W#1 DoublesDeborah Dekker / Felisse Starker vs Catherine Traynor / Diana Mullen1-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesKimberly Paolercio vs Carmen Heady6-4, 4-1
W#2 DoublesAlicia Cintron / Laura Feinerman vs Diane Weidenbaum / Reyna Gonzalez6-3, 4-2
W#3 DoublesCaroline Eickelbeck / Pamela Tuzzo vs Laura Buck / Anita Reisdorf6-2, 4-4
W#1 DoublesRobyn Cameron / Deborah Dekker vs Lisa Zedlovich / Ann Zimmerman6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCaroline Eickelbeck / Laura Feinerman vs Paula Pereira / Danielle Weisberg6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJoan Stone / Diana Vettoretti vs Helen Sherwood / Susan Halper6-4, 6-2
L#1 DoublesLindsay Brand / Kimberly Paolercio vs Tracy Inall / Laura Denis7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Maisheva vs Mary Ellen Foley3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Mulcahy / Monica Lynn vs Shelley Terry / Lisa DelGiudice3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPamela Tuzzo / Ani Khachian vs Gina Viebrock / Lisa Halpern6-1, 6-2
2025-06-03vs Saw Mill Genesis SlammersWon 31
L#1 DoublesFelisse Starker / Alicia Cintron vs Fran Torres / Meredith Outwater4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRobyn Cameron vs Christine Dimaano2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Dekker / Kristen Mulcahy vs Pamela Veith / Robin Levy7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCaroline Eickelbeck / Ani Khachian vs Doreen Erickson / Cathleen Newsham6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesRobyn Cameron / Alicia Cintron vs Regina Allegretti-Davenport / Karen Friedberg6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKimberly Paolercio vs Dana Rosenberg2-6, 5-6
W#2 DoublesDeborah Dekker / Kristen Mulcahy vs Lucia Roberta / Nayoung Lee6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoan Stone / Diana Vettoretti vs Tina Palmieri / Dorothy Sarchiapone6-4, 6-6
2025-05-20vs Fairview Country ClubWon 31
W#1 DoublesLindsay Brand / Felisse Starker vs Jocelyn Herman / Stephanie Javorsky3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKimberly Paolercio vs Allison Baumrind7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCaroline Eickelbeck / Laura Strober vs Lisa Behrman / Julie Karish4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPamela Tuzzo / Diana Vettoretti vs Chari Hirshson / Daryl Gurian Stern6-1, 6-4
2025-05-13vs Paramount County Club Hot ShotsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAlicia Cintron / Deborah Dekker vs Sari Seidel / Judith Rubinstein6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDiana Vettoretti vs Sheryl Salerno3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Feinerman / Lara Loverro vs Sheryl Pilavin / Jodi Sarf3-6, 0-3
W#3 DoublesAni Khachian / Kristen Mulcahy vs Laurie Markiewicz / Hollie Bialek6-3, 5-7
2025-05-12vs Birchwood OverservedLost 13
W#1 DoublesFelisse Starker / Robyn Cameron vs Coleen Lynam / Beth Cohen6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLindsay Brand vs Yanshu Li4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Strober / Lauren Neustat vs Sheri Cohen / Molly Convery2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Stone / Svetlana Maisheva vs Lauren Levinson / Justine Mohr6-3, 6-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings37 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fairview Country Club000000
2Paramount County Club Hot Shots08181333279
3Chappaqua Swim and Tennis - Spin and Tonic08101939321
4Birchwood Overserved08121840293
5Lakeside Field Club: Ladies of Lakeside0892147325
6Sportime HI - Hits & Giggles09241024270
7Club Fit Briarcliff: Slice Of Life0925925240
8Armonk Tennis Club: Aces Wild09201230301
9Saw Mill Genesis Slammers09191635313
10Willowbrook Swim and Tennis Wildcats09181535323
11Pleasantville Tennis Club09191637325
12Saw Mill 40+ Smashers09132245323
13Club Fit JV - ACES09122348346
14West Nyack Swim Club - The Terminetters0992658362
15Pelham Country Club: Summer Smashers0943165402
16Hampshire CC: Racket Rebels01036413247
17Manursing Island Club: MICONICS01031619247
18Southern: Maximum Tennis01029921239
19Scarsdale Golf Club01031924264
20Chestnut Ridge: Smash Hits010281024269
21TIA: Volley Dolls010261328243
22County Tennis Club: Scarsdale Smashers010251229270
23WTC: 3.0 40+ Shots Fired010251233308
24WTC: 3.0 40+ L: Double Trouble010241335319
25West Nyack Swim Club - Nice Aces010241535310
26NYAC Racqueteers010201941332
27Ossining Osselots010192046358
28Orienta Beach Club: Sets on the Beach010142352378
29Chappaqua Swim and Tennis - Ace Whuppers010152352376
30Yonkers Tennis Center - Simply Smashing010142553387
31Coveleigh: Hits Different010132658395
32NYAC: Sugar & Slice Girls010102858390
33Tarrycrest Swim and Tennis010122659414
34Sportime MBYC- ARMADA UNITED010102859385
35Hampshire Blue01083265435
36V.I.P. Club01063267434
37Trump National Golf Club: Honey Deuces01083268440

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Robyn Cameron
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.88
Lindsay Brand
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Deborah Dekker
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.83
Svetlana Maisheva
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.81
Alicia Cintron
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Kimberly Paolercio
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.74
Caroline Eickelbeck
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Joan Stone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Laura Feinerman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.63
Felisse Starker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Kim Goldberg
published
2.59
Pamela Tuzzo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Ani Khachian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Diana Vettoretti
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.53
Kristen Mulcahy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.43
Monica Lynn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jane Fragner
published
Lara Loverro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Strober
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Neustat
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tamar Schweitzer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamar Schweitzer + Kim Goldberg3557% games+10.2% vs expected
Laura Strober + Lara Loverro4157% games+6.1% vs expected
Alicia Cintron + Robyn Cameron11260% games+4.4% vs expected
Felisse Starker + Deborah Dekker6350% games+3.6% vs expected
Pamela Tuzzo + Diana Vettoretti4352% games+1.4% vs expected
Deborah Dekker + Jane Fragner4349% games+1.4% vs expected
Deborah Dekker + Laura Strober171254% games+1.1% vs expected
Felisse Starker + Kim Goldberg4351% games+0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robyn Cameron
51W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Lindsay Brand
30W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.88
3
Deborah Dekker
101W–50L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Svetlana Maisheva
64W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Alicia Cintron
197W–128L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Kimberly Paolercio
10W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Caroline Eickelbeck
62W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Joan Stone
89W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Laura Feinerman
33W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Felisse Starker
98W–115L career · 6 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.63
Kim Goldberg
21W–21L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Pamela Tuzzo
35W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Ani Khachian
51W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
3
Diana Vettoretti
22W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
Kristen Mulcahy
39W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Monica Lynn
19W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.43
Jane Fragner
33W–31L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lara Loverro
38W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Laura Strober
24W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Neustat
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tamar Schweitzer
8W–26L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.