Teams

West Nyack Swim Club - The Terminetters

2025 40&Over Women · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.80 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-22vs Sportime Harbor IslandLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren McCarthy / Jennifer Chemerov vs Jennifer Taubenfeld / Jennifer Madden2-6, 2-6
2025-07-15vs Chestnut Ridge: Smash HitsLost 01
L#3 DoublesDianne Santoro / Christine Payne vs Melissa Mendez / Lauren Ritter1-6, 3-6
2025-07-08vs Manursing Island Club: MICONICSLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Payne / Maura Hanigan vs Mary Bianchi / Bettina Scott Funk0-6, 2-3
2025-07-07vs Hampshire BlueWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren McCarthy / Jennifer Chemerov vs Linda Negrin / Megan Watkins6-3, 4-5
2025-06-29vs Saw Mill 40+ SmashersLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Chemerov / Rebecca Bloch vs Chioma Blinn / Suzanne Millette2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Lawrence / Dianne Santoro vs Lucy Adamcheck / Bonnie McLeod5-7, 4-6
2025-06-20vs WTC: 3.0 40+ Shots FiredLost 01
L#3 DoublesDianne Santoro / Christine Payne vs Emily Catto / Sylvia Swanson1-6, 3-6
2025-06-03vs Sportime MBYC- ARMADA UNITEDLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristine Payne / Dianne Santoro vs Veronica Barnes / Carol Sherman1-6, 0-6
2025-05-27vs Ossining OsselotsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Chemerov / Claudiane O'Mara vs Ronnie Jennings / Gina DiLillo1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTonianne Desimone / Christine Payne vs La'Shawn Sterling / Hong Zhao0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings37 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fairview Country Club000000
2Paramount County Club Hot Shots08181333279
3Chappaqua Swim and Tennis - Spin and Tonic08101939321
4Birchwood Overserved08121840293
5Lakeside Field Club: Ladies of Lakeside0892147325
6Sportime HI - Hits & Giggles09241024270
7Club Fit Briarcliff: Slice Of Life0925925240
8Armonk Tennis Club: Aces Wild09201230301
9Saw Mill Genesis Slammers09191635313
10Willowbrook Swim and Tennis Wildcats09181535323
11Pleasantville Tennis Club09191637325
12Saw Mill 40+ Smashers09132245323
13Club Fit JV - ACES09122348346
14West Nyack Swim Club - The Terminetters0992658362
15Pelham Country Club: Summer Smashers0943165402
16Hampshire CC: Racket Rebels01036413247
17Manursing Island Club: MICONICS01031619247
18Southern: Maximum Tennis01029921239
19Scarsdale Golf Club01031924264
20Chestnut Ridge: Smash Hits010281024269
21TIA: Volley Dolls010261328243
22County Tennis Club: Scarsdale Smashers010251229270
23WTC: 3.0 40+ Shots Fired010251233308
24WTC: 3.0 40+ L: Double Trouble010241335319
25West Nyack Swim Club - Nice Aces010241535310
26NYAC Racqueteers010201941332
27Ossining Osselots010192046358
28Orienta Beach Club: Sets on the Beach010142352378
29Chappaqua Swim and Tennis - Ace Whuppers010152352376
30Yonkers Tennis Center - Simply Smashing010142553387
31Coveleigh: Hits Different010132658395
32NYAC: Sugar & Slice Girls010102858390
33Tarrycrest Swim and Tennis010122659414
34Sportime MBYC- ARMADA UNITED010102859385
35Hampshire Blue01083265435
36V.I.P. Club01063267434
37Trump National Golf Club: Honey Deuces01083268440

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Claudiane O'Mara
published 3
2.40
Dianne Santoro
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.38
Christine Payne
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.27
Lorraine Grande
published
Carla Zambri
published 2.5
2.22
Jami Weill
published 2.5
Ellen Brower
published
Jennifer Chemerov
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karen McCarthy
published
Mary Kardashian
published
Megan Washington
published
Nicole Masi
published
Stacy Rosen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dianne Santoro + Christine Payne21631% games−17.3% vs expected
Jami Weill + Mary Kardashian0732% gamesnot enough data
Mary Kardashian + Christine Payne033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Claudiane O'Mara
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dianne Santoro
2W–23L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.40
3
Christine Payne
2W–24L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.38
Lorraine Grande
8W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Carla Zambri
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Jami Weill
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
Ellen Brower
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Chemerov
18W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen McCarthy
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Kardashian
1W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Washington
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Masi
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy Rosen
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.